Interested in linking to "Not Your Daddy’s HART Standard"?
You may use the Headline, Deck, Byline and URL of this article on your Web site. To link to this article, select and copy the HTML code below and paste it on your own Web site.
“HART is the de facto standard in this industry and will remain so for a significant time. It is standard in all our devices,” says Hans Georg Kumpfmüller, Siemens AG, Germany. Not only a de facto standard, HART technology also is established in IEC global standards. In IEC61804, HART EDDL technology is established in cooperation with Fieldbus Foundation and Profibus Nutzerorganization (PNO). In IEC 61158, the HART Application Layer and Services are part of the standard. IEC 61784-1 establishes the HART Communication Profile.
“I see HART 7 as the reliable, low-cost solution for users to use more of the power in their installed HART-enabled devices,” says Thomas Holmes, CEO of MACTek Corporation, a manufacturer of HART modems. “The additional features included in HART 7 step up the game, opening opportunities for improved asset management, lower operating cost, and less downtime.”
HART technology is one of the most widely used fieldbus communication standards in the world. Seventy percent of the process measurement and control devices shipped worldwide each year use HART communication, adding to the over 41% of installed devices that already use HART communication—for a total of over 26 million devices shipped and installed worldwide.
As devices have changed, applications have changed, and requirements have changed, HART has also changed to keep pace. All the things you knew and loved about HART Communication before are still true, but with the new capabilities of HART 7, there’s a whole lot more. HART Communication is not your daddy’s protocol!
“The HART protocol was originally a hybrid analog-digital technology,” says Peter Zornio, Chief Strategic Officer, Emerson Process Management. “By contrast, WirelessHART (part of HART 7) is an all-new, all-digital mesh networking technology. What’s been retained in WirelessHART and enhanced in HART 7 for both wired and wireless are the tools, technologies, and practices used to configure devices from multiple vendors in a standard manner and integrate their data into host systems.”
The current generation of the HART Communication Protocol is HART 7. The HART 7 feature that has already received the most interest publicly since its release in September 2007, is WirelessHART, an evolutionary extension to the HART Protocol. According to Sean Ireland, wireless product manager for Siemens Energy and Automation, “This would be rated extremely high in importance, both to us and our customers. Wired and wireless products must work together in a common network.”
But HART 7 is significantly more than WirelessHART. There are significant differences and improvements between HART 5 and HART 6, the most commonly installed and used versions of HART, and HART 7—and not just wireless, either.
“There will be increased diagnostic capability built into the instrument,” says ABB’s Gareth Johnston, “and the ability to report by exception, based on time or event.” But in keeping with the HART Communication Foundation’s long-standing commitment to the users of the HART protocol, HART 7 is fully backward-compatible with all the HART versions that came before it.
The fact that WirelessHART is simply part of the HART 7 standard shows off an important characteristic. Wired HART and WirelessHART are intended to be used together seamlessly, as integral parts of a digital field sensor and control network. They operate the same way, program the same way, and are useable interchangeably, wired and wireless.
ABB’s Johnston says, “WirelessHART is the logical migration of the current HART technology to a wireless environment.” He continues, “Customers now have the capability to maintain their current legacy 4-20 mA loops and unlock the power of HART instrument data via HART wirelessly.”
What do the HART users get? Johnston continues, “This will enable customers to obtain real-time asset monitoring data. This data will permit them to better manage the health of their instruments, thus insuring a reliable measure of their process.”
The HART protocol is enshrined in several IEC global standards, and the WirelessHART portion of HART 7 has been submitted for ballot as an additional IEC standard. HART has become both an IEC and de facto global standard because it is easy to use, simple to understand, flexible, and adaptable, and it can be used anywhere in the world. WirelessHART, because it uses the 2.4 GHz band, can also be used almost everywhere in the world without licensing challenges.
In Table 1, you can see what’s been added to HART 7: new capabilities for increased intelligence and communication throughput efficiency, with new features such as enhanced data publishing for process variables, configuration change and device diagnostic status alerts, with support for “Publish by Exception” and “Automatic Event Notification.” Another exceptionally valuable new feature: “Time-Stamped Data,” applies to device process variables, diagnostics status, and configuration change events. This new feature supports broader use of multivariable device capabilities in control systems and permits users to employ better forensics in the event of problems. Measurements or actions can be triggered at a specific time, and HART 7 allows synchronized operation across multiple devices.
In HART 7, Process Variable Trends can now be sent as 12 sequential time-stamped data points of the same process variable in a single packet, effectively multiplying communication throughput for the selected process variable. “This makes it easy to setup a plant-wide asset management system,” says Endress + Hauser vice president Victor Wolowec.
Faster configuration uploads are now possible in HART 7 with multiple read commands in one transaction.
Plus, HART 7 adds a number of additional standardized device diagnostic and status parameters such as “device memory,” “power,” and maintenance and environmental variables.
WirelessHART is an evolutionary extension to the wired HART Communication protocol that enables wireless communication with field devices. It is built on established standards and proven technologies, while preserving fundamental HART principles of low-cost digital connectivity, interoperability, and backward compatibility. This preserves the investments of both users and suppliers in wired HART technology, while providing a path forward to the wireless future. There are four WirelessHART specifications built on the 13 core HART specifications.
“WirelessHART is an important milestone,” says Yokogawa’s Kaoru Sonoda, communications and diagnosis for field instrumentation group manager.
WirelessHART is real, scalable, useable in all the ways HART wired devices are, capable of talking to any control system or asset management system over any backbone or protocol, and at least 17 companies are in the process of producing WirelessHART devices for sale. And every single one of them interoperates with each other, and with all the wired HART devices that have ever been made by any vendor.
The first versions of HART were designed to bring smart field devices into the world of control and automation, and they succeeded wildly. Even today, many HART devices are operated in strictly analog mode, and the HART smarts are used strictly for setup and calibration.
Yet the push toward added value from intelligent field devices has also led to the use of HART devices in many control systems for enhanced system integration—taking the digital signal through HART multiplexers directly into the control system, for additional process variables, online diagnostics, and better alarm management.
Now, with HART 7, the HART protocol integrates wired and wireless devices into a common control network and adds additional functionality to improve alarm management and maintenance diagnosis.
“The unsolicited messaging capability is probably one of the most immediate benefits,” says Scott Saunders, vice president of sales and marketing for Moore Industries-International. “All plants are doing more with less personnel. Having HART slave devices that are able to perform predictive maintenance on their own is a real plus.”
A major reason for the success of the HART protocol is backward-compatibility and Electrical Interchangeability. HCF’s definition of these terms is rigorous:
“There is no necessity for existing HART 5 users to move to HART 7 because they are satisfied with existing features,” Yokogawa’s Sonoda points out. “However some users intend to move to HART 7 from HART 5 so they can use the new functions of HART 7.”
The watchword of the modern HART 7 standard is protocol versatility—a key to interoperability.
You can use “traditional” HART, which is a 4-20 mADC current loop, with a digitally encoded signal: a 1200 bps Frequency Shift Keyed (FSK) sine wave modulated on the current signal that enables bi-directional communications of configuration, process variables, and diagnostics information to and from the intelligent device. Or you can use the High-Speed HART PSK specification. This specification provides for a digitally encoded signal on a 4-20 mADC current loop, but this time, it is Phase Shift Keyed at 9600 bps; eight times faster than “traditional” HART FSK signalling. And, of course, PSK HART is completely backward-compatible with FSK HART.
In addition, HART Communication can be run over RS485 (Modbus), Profibus and Profinet, Ethernet, OPC, and WirelessHART.
Interoperability also requires a defined command set that every device must do. Every HART device must accommodate the Universal Command set, and be able to perform Identity Verification (Unique ID, Tag, Descriptor, etc.), as well as read device dynamic variables, loop-current values, diagnostics, and other variables in the device.
Every device should also use the Common Practice Commands, such as device management commands for ranging, loop-current setup, sensor trim, and other standard capabilities. Most HART devices support the Common Practice Commands.
In addition, every WirelessHART device must support the defined set of Wireless Commands required for setup, operation, performance mointoring, and diagnosis of the WirelessHART network. The Wireless Command set specifically defines all requirements for joining, security, message routing, diagnostic reports, bandwidth allocation, and other necessary capabilities to ensure interoperability, proper performance, and network coexistence. Key required diagnostics include remaining battery life (in days), average communication latency, and packet loss counter (normally “0”).
All HART devices have an interoperable universal set of diagnostics. These universal diagnostic alerts are designed for continuous monitoring by HART-enabled control and intelligent I/O systems, for immediate detection of loop-integrity and/or device problems.
Every HART device conforms to this universal diagnostics set, meaning that diagnosing problems on any HART device from any manufacturer works the same way.
The most important feature of HART 7 is the integration versatility of the technology. Wired or wireless, HART offers unparalleled ease in integration with systems. Using EDDL, OPC, and XML, HART 7 communicates with any advanced control, simulation, asset management or enterprise integration system.
All major control system suppliers offer HART-enabled I/O as standard equipment. Almost all major field device manufacturers offer HART-enabled devices.
A significant number of third-party products support integration with legacy control systems using a variety of devices such as Multiplexers (HART to RS-485) and Gateways (HART to Ethernet, HART to Modbus, HART to Profibus, etc.) and Single-Loop Monitors (devices that convert digital values and alerts to analog signals and contact closures that older DCS and SCADA systems can use)... and of course, there’s wireless.
Wired or wireless, HART 7 easily interfaces with the rest of the world. “One of the many strengths of a HART device,” says MACTek’s Holmes, “is that the 26-plus million installed devices work on any analog or digital control system or PLC.”
“Clear end-user advantages also result,” says Emerson’s vice president of wireless, Bob Karshnia, “since HART 7 didn’t change what didn’t need to be changed. Users with working HART systems can continue to use HART 5 host system products and add supplemental HART 7 functionality to the host when ready, and then continue to add HART 5 or HART 7 products going forward.”
ControlGlobal.com is exclusively dedicated to the global process automation market. We report on developing industry trends, illustrate successful industry applications, and update the basic skills and knowledge base that provide the profession's foundation.