Addressing Control Applications Using Wireless Devices

How Wired and Wireless Transmitter Installations Differ in Closed-Loop Control Applications and What Changes Are Required in the PID

Share Print Related RSS
Page 2 of 4 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 View on one page

  • the magnitude of the difference between the new measurement value and the last communicated measurement value is greater that a specified trigger value; 
  • or if the time since the last communication exceeds a maximum update period.

Thus, the measurement is communicated only as often as required to allow control action to correct for unmeasured disturbances or response to setpoint changes. For windowed mode you must specify an update period, a maximum update period and a trigger value. The update period and the maximum update period are separate configured values. For best control performance process disturbances, the update period configured for window communications should be one-fourth the process response. If disturbance response is not critical, then a slower update period may be used.

To provide best control, the PID must be restructured to correctly handle continuous measurement updates that are communicated much slower than 4 times the process response time. The PID also must be able to work with the non-periodic measurement updates that are provided when window trigger mode is configured. The PIDPlus capability included in DeltaV v11 is specifically designed to address control using wireless measurements. The implementation of the PIDPlus in DeltaV v11 is shown below.

The filter output used in the positive feedback network is calculated in the following manner when a new measurement is received.

Equation 1

Where
FN = New filter output
FN-1 = Filter output last execution = filter output after last new measurement
ON-1 = Controller Output last execution
ΔT = Elapsed time since a new value was communicated

Control execution is set much faster than measurement update. This permits immediate action on setpoint change and update in the faceplate. PIDPlus tuning is based on the process dynamic (e.g. RESET= process time constant plus dead time); PIDPlus reset automatically compensates for variations in the measurement update rate. No change in PID tuning is required for varying update rate.

To further enhance the response for continuous changes in setpoint, the implementation of the PIDPlus may be modified as shown below.

PIDPlus in DeltaV v12
Figure 4 – PIDPlus in DeltaV v12

This PIDPlus implementation is standard in DeltaV v12 and allows the reset calculation to automatically compensate for setpoint change and measurement update rate. When either PIDPlus implantation is used, there is no need to modify tuning as sample rate changes; i.e., reset is based strictly on the process response dynamics.

The derivative component of the PIDPlus is also modified to account for the fact that a new measurement value is not available each execution of the PID. The changes in the derivative calculation are shown below.

Derivative Calculation in PIDPlus 
Figure 5 – Derivative Calculation in PIDPlus

The derivative contribution is only updated when a new measurement becomes available. Also, the calculation is based on the elapsed time since a new value was communicated.

Control Performance Comparison

When the PIDPlus is used with a wireless transmitter in a control application, the performance will be comparable to that achieved using a wired transmitter with a wired transmitter. To demonstrate this, the module shown below was created in DeltaV that allows the control using PIDPlus using a wireless communication to be compared to the control achieved using PID and a wired transmitter. 

Wireless test environment
Figure 6 - Wireless test environment 

The simulated processes controlled by the PIDPlus and PID were identical and designed to use the same unmeasured disturbances. Also, using a module parameter, the setpoint value to the PID and PIDPlus can be changed at the same time. Using this capability, tests were conducted in which changes were made in the setpoint and unmeasured disturbance. The PID and PIDPlus control response is shown in the following trend.

For the test shown above, the communications window trigger mode was utilized with a maximum update period of 10 seconds and a trigger value of 1%. As shown, the control performance using wireless was comparable to that achieved using a PID and wired transmitter executing once per second. However, by using window trigger mode, the wireless communications used by the PIDPlus were 96% less than the number of new measurement values provided by the wired transmitter to the PID. The impact of non-periodic measurement updates on control performance as measured by integral of absolute error (IAE) is minimized through the use of PIDPlus for wireless communication as summarized below.

Wired vs. Wireless Control Performance
Figure 7 - Wired vs. wireless control performance

Page 2 of 4 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 View on one page
Share Print Reprints Permissions

What are your comments?

You cannot post comments until you have logged in. Login Here.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments