Controllers: Direct vs. Reverse-Acting Control

Valve Failure Position and Controller Actions Are Independently Determined. In This Article our Experts Tackle Them Separately

By Bela Liptak

Q: As I understand it, if the controller output increases when the measurement value rises, it is a direct-acting controller, and if controller output decreases when the measurement rises, it is a reverse-acting controller. In addition, at minimum output of the controller, the desired fail-safe action must be achieved. For example, if we have two controllers on a distillation column—reflux and net overhead—where the reflux control valve is fail-open, and net overhead control valve is fail-close, the reflux controller will be reverse-acting, and the net overhead controller will be direct-acting. Is my understanding correct? - Vasant Warke / vasant.warke@ril.com

Sign up for Smart Industry 2017 and receive a $150 registration discount

A: Valve failure position and controller actions are independently determined, therefore, let's talk about them separately.

Valve failure position is determined by safety considerations. If, in case of failure, you want your column to go on full reflux, your selection is right (Figure 1). Assuming that the valve actuators are spring-operated pneumatic ones (you did not say what they were), and assuming that you define "failure" as the loss of air supply, the spring will act to open a fail-open (FO) valve and to close a fail-closed (FC) valve, regardless what the controller actions are. (I neglect to mention the role of positioners because I don't like to use them on flow control valves because they can be slower than the flow process and, therefore, they can cause cycling.)

Now let's turn to the subject of controller action. Assuming that your system is as shown in the figure, an increase in column temperature should result in increased cooling, which is accomplished by returning more cold reflux into the column. This means that the temperature controller (TC) has to reduce the reflux flow setpoint, which in turn will increase the level in the accumulator, and to overcome that, the level control (LC) increases the setpoint of the reflux flow control (FC). So a measurement increase requires the TC to reduce its output (reverse action, R/A), while the LC increases its output upon a level increase (D/A). The response of the slave FC controllers is to increase the flow through their valves as the master raises their setpoint, so with the FC valve, it will be D/A, and with the FO valve, it will be R/A.

Naturally, the control system shown in the figure is a very simple one (does nothing about interactions, etc.), but it is sufficient for explaining the issue at hand.

Béla Lipták
liptakbela@aol.com

A:

Direct action means that the controller output rises if the measurement increases. Indirect (reverse) action means that the controller output drops when the measurement rises.

Al Pawlowski, PE
avp2@almont.com

Also Read "Considerations for Selecting a Controller- or Server-Based Batch Sequencer"

A: Not quite right. The control valve failure action (and sometimes the valve positioner action) is also relevant. To ensure that you have an overall negative feedback, you need to follow the entire loop from sensor (increase/decrease output as variable increases) through the controller (where you can reverse the gain) to the positioner (normally direct action, but foolish folks sometimes try to hide mistakes there by reversing output) to valve (does increasing stem position increase or decrease the measured variable?).

Ian H.Gibson
gibs0108@optusnet.com.au

A: The controller action is relative to the definition of the error. If error = setpoint – process variable, then a reverse-acting controller will cause the process variable to decrease when the controller output increases, and vice versa.

Valve fail position is not a function of the controller, but a function of safety, or zero energy in case of a failure in the energy supply to the final control element. DCSs have different ways to deal with fail position and controller action, and the configuration should be made according to what make sense to the operation.

Sigifredo Nino
SNino@SummaControlSolutions.com

A: I usually like to look at the error reading in the controller, meaning the difference between setpoint and process variable. If an increase in error increases the controller output, it's direct-acting. If increase in error causes controller output to decrease, it's a reverse-acting controller.

Hiten A. Dalal, PE, PMP
hiten_dalal@kindermorgan.com

A: The question I always ask is: when the measurement increases, what does the controller output need to do to bring it back to setpoint? For example, if a back-pressure controller (where a control valve opens to decrease the pressure measured upstream of it) sees a rise in pressure, it should increase its output. Increase measurement/increase output is "increase/increase" or direct-acting.

In contrast, nearly every flow controller I've seen is "increase/decrease" or reverse-acting. Mr. Warke's reflux loop would be reverse-acting. We want the valve to be "closed" when the controller output is 0% and "open" when it is 100%, regardless of the valve's failure position. This makes it consistent for the operator. So when the controller sees an increase in flow, it must decrease its output (close the valve) to return it to setpoint.

I don't think you can generalize in terms of application. Even though a direct-acting flow loop is rare, you could design one or encounter one. If we were dealing strictly with old pneumatics or self-contained mechanical controllers, then your reflux example would be "direct-acting." The pneumatic controller would have to increase its signal in response to an increase in flow.

A level controller, whose output controls the valve on the tank inlet, is reverse-acting, but if the valve is on the outlet, it becomes direct-acting. A temperature application can be controlling cooling water to an exchanger (direct) or a cooling water bypass (reverse) I can't think of a way to make up a rule for a clerk or a computer algorithm that states some simple "if this, then this" for direct- or reverse-acting. Maybe I'm slow, but I still have to think through each application.

John Rezabek
jrezabek@ashland.com

A: I believe you have your cause and effect backward. Think only of the controller. Consider the input (process variable) to the controller as the cause and the controller output as the effect. If the controller is set for direct-acting, then an increase in PV will cause the output to increase. If the controller is set for reverse-acting, an increase in PV will cause the output to decrease.

To make the correct setting for direct/reverse-acting, you have to consider the process effect all the way from the controller output to the process variable. Does a controller output cause the valve to open or close? Some valves are fail-open; some are fail-closed. Does an increase in valve position cause the PV to go up or go down? Opening a steam valve to a heat exchanger (HX) would cause the HX output temperature to rise, whereas opening a cooling water valve would cause the HX output temperature to go down.

In summary, considering all the effects between the controller output and the PV, if an increase in controller output causes the PV to rise, or a decrease in controller output causes the PV to fall (that is, the PV moves in the same direction as the controller output), then the process can be called direct-acting, so the controller should be set for the opposite, reverse-acting. Thus, if a process disturbance causes the PV to rise, the reverse-acting controller will decrease its output. Consequently, this decrease in controller output will cause the direct-acting process variable to decrease, thus moving it in the opposite direction from that which caused the disturbance.

Harold Wade
Hlwade@aol.com

A: I believe that your understanding of direct-/reverse-acting applied to control valves is correct. However, the fail-safe action has nothing to do with direct/reverse action. The failure action is dictated purely by the position of the spring against which the pneumatic diaphragm operates in the control valve actuator. They're defined independently when the control valve is specified (fail-safe action) and again during configuration of the control valve positioner or the controller outputting to the control valve (direct-/reverse-acting).

Dick Caro
RCaro@CMC.us

Guide to operator interface - access a compilation of useful articles on this topic

 

Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.

Comments

  • <p>I have a query here - if the response of the reflux FC controllers is to increase the reflux flow through their valves as the master (TC or LC) raises their setpoint, then are we allowed to have the reflux Flow valve to be Fail-close? </p> <p>The reason I am asking this question is - the prime intention of reflux control here is to maintain the temperature within the distillation column, and if we choose to have our reflux flow valve to be Fail-close, that could be unsafe for the process. Please indicate if my understanding is correct?</p> <p>Also, in the arrangement given, can we use ratio controller for the Flow valves on either side of downstream of reflux drum. Because anyway temperature control would require more of reflux back into the column, and on the other hand any excess of reflux going to the column will be the throughput of column.</p>

    Reply

  • <p>i had my control class today and it was quite different &gt;&gt; if the output signal increases and the input signal increases it's calles direct &gt;&gt; but if the output signal increases and the input signal decreases it's called reverse &gt;&gt; but i really need help understanding these definitions by simple examples if there is any please</p>

    Reply

  • <p>In response to the question (khaled nabilsy) , Taking the a controller in isolation and not using the example discussed above. the most basic example is a Heating Controller Vs a Cooling controller. In a Heating Controller as Temperature increases you need to turn DOWN the heating and vice versa - Reverse acting... In a Cooling Controller as Temperature Increases you need to Turn UP the Cooling and vice versa - Direct Acting... Of course life is not always so simple so in a control loop you must take into consideration the reverse or direct action of the actuator, its positioner if it has one, and any other control equipment of the control loop as a whole. This is often defined by the failsafe status of each individual component. In certain circumstances I have known this to mean that perhaps even in a cooling control loop a reverse acting control was required to give a direct action to the control loop as a whole entity......</p>

    Reply

  • <p>it is valuable informationof direct/reverse controller and example mentioned.</p>

    Reply

  • <p>it is simple and valuable explanation. thank you so much.</p>

    Reply

  • viagra tabletas 50 m http://buycheapviagralk.com/ - viagra viagra coupon order viagra fast

    Reply

  • cialis and generic cialis [url=http://cheapopcialisonline.com/]cialis[/url] buy cialis cialis prescription coverage

    Reply

  • vendita viagra torino [url=http://buycheapviagralk.com/] generic viagra online[/url] generic viagra online we choice soft tabs viagra

    Reply

  • we choice purchase cialis [url=http://cheapopcialisonline.com/]generic cialis[/url] cialis discounts cialis

    Reply

  • usefull link price of viagra [url=http://buyviagraolonline.com/]online viagra[/url] viagra generic viagra uk buy online

    Reply

  • the best site viagra buy [url=http://buyviagraolonline.com/]viagra[/url] viagra generic commande viagra et cialis

    Reply

  • viagra to get hard [url=http://buyviagraolonline.com/]viagra pills[/url] cheap viagra online wow)) buy viagra online viagra

    Reply

  • costo de cialis en colombia [url=http://ordercheapocialis.com/]cialis generic[/url] cialis cheap w w w buy cialis dt

    Reply

  • cialis oder levitra [url=http://ordercheapocialis.com/]cialis online[/url] cialis cheap buy brand cialis de next day

    Reply

  • campione viagra libero in uk [url=http://viagraonlineops.com/]buy viagra online[/url] cheap viagra comprar levitra cialis viagra

    Reply

  • order viagra on-line [url=http://viagraonlineops.com/]online viagra[/url] generic viagra viagra netista

    Reply

  • viagra prescription drug uk [url=http://viagraonlineops.com/]viagra buy[/url] buy viagra online ordonnance pour viagra

    Reply

  • cialis kamagra pharmacy onlin [url=http://cialisactiveokl.com/]buy cialis online[/url] buy cialis online cheap cialis online in aus

    Reply

  • wieviel kostet eine viagra [url=http://viagraprofessionalok.com/]generic viagra[/url] viagra generic para que es el viagra femenino

    Reply

  • comprar cialis in usa [url=http://cialisactiveokl.com/]buy cialis[/url] cilais price order real cialis - here

    Reply

  • natural replacement for cialis [url=http://cialisactiveokl.com/]cheap cialis[/url] buy cialis online how cost cialis

    Reply

  • old man fucking useing viagra [url=http://viagraprofessionalok.com/]online viagra[/url] cheap viagra online cost viagra pill

    Reply

  • order generic viagra [url=http://viagra100mgonlineh.com/]generic viagra[/url] cheap viagra online cheapest generic viagra net

    Reply

  • cialis canadian pharmacy [url=http://cialisactiveokl.com/]cialis cheap[/url] buy cialis online cialis 10 mg cost pill

    Reply

  • viagra pfizer usa 100mg preis [url=http://viagra100mgonlineh.com/]buy viagra[/url] generic viagra will viagra cialis cause cough

    Reply

  • cialis v generic [url=http://buyxocialishnline.com/]buy cialis online[/url] cilais price cialis romani

    Reply

  • cialis canada rx!people group [url=http://canadiancialisonlinex.com/]buy cialis[/url] generic cialis kamagra cialis bestellen

    Reply

  • buy generic gel viagra online [url=http://buyviagrahzonline.com/]viagra[/url] cheap viagra online wow)) viagra info

    Reply

  • il costo di 5 mg cialis [url=http://canadiancialisonlinex.com/]buy cialis[/url] buy cialis online cialis india best per pill

    Reply

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments