Expanding Your Process Automation Plant Requires Bigger Data Too

Foremost Farms Doubles Production and Adds Data Acquisition and Historian Functions to Its SCADA/HMI System to Find Exceptions and Improve Operations

By Jim Montague

Share Print Related RSS
Page 1 of 2 « Prev 1 | 2 View on one page

Growth means change—so it's not easy for people, organizations or even, I suspect, for hardworking microorganisms turning juice into wine or milk into cheese.

Similarly, food and beverage manufacturers have always been serious about process control and automation, but they usually haven't had to be quite as obsessive as their counterparts in the oil, gas and chemical fields. This is likely because food and beverage applications don't traditionally operate at temperatures, pressures and product volumes as high as those in traditionally bigger-ticket oil, gas and chemical processes, so there's typically less potential for accidents and injuries.

Well, times are changing, and food and beverage production for many manufacturers is way up, so they're adopting more sophisticated and affordable sensing and control technologies as their applications expand, though this can mean overcoming some initial growing pains too.

For example, Foremost Farms USA, in Baraboo, Wis., recently doubled the size of its cheese-making operations at its production plant in Appleton, Wis. It increased production from processing 1 million to more than 2.2 million pounds of milk per day, and from producing 65 million to 130 million pounds of cheese per year by adding a second production line, and increasing its packaging lines from two to four. But this expansion also required more data gathering, handling and analysis to keep all its processes running optimally (Figure 1). Either Foremost Farms' engineers had to install and maintain more of the paper chart recorders and loggers they'd been using, or they had to find another way manage all their critical signals and operating information.

Cooperative Venture

Foremost Farms is a farmer-owned milk-processing and marketing cooperative, and its 1,700 member/owners produce more than 5 billion pounds of milk per year, which its 12 plants use to manufacture cheese, butter, specialty whey ingredients, bulk fluid milk and other products for markets and applications worldwide (Figure 2). The cooperative is the seventh-largest U.S dairy cooperative, and it has annual sales of $1.7 billion, which places it 24th in annual sales among the top 100 U.S. dairy processors. Its whey products include pharmaceutical-grade lactose, which is dried and crystallized to different sizes, so it can be used to convey timed-release medicines.

To collect, organize and interpret all its extra cheese production data—and make useful decisions based on it—Foremost Farms decided skip the usual chart recorders and loggers, and expand its data acquisition (DAQ) and historian capabilities within its existing HMI/SCADA software and interfaces. As a result, the Appleton plant also expanded its use of GE Intelligent Platforms' Proficy Historian DAQ functions with its existing Proficy iFix SCADA/HMI software to collect and help analyze data, find exceptions and improve operations. System integration of the project was performed by P. J. Kortens & Co., also of Appleton, and distributor Industrial Network Services in Arlington Heights, Ill.



"Foremost Farms has been using Proficy iFix for about 16 years, but just for process control. About 10 years ago, we began using iFix and Proficy Historian to gather trends electronically via existing Cisco routers and Ethernet networking. That's when we began to stop putting in new recorders and loggers, and it's what encouraged us to use Proficy Historian for the plant expansion," says Sheri Tuzinkewich, dairy industry consultant and Foremost Farms' former process integration manager. "We'd also been lacking some accurate data from our loggers. We weren't getting enough information after production. And we couldn't drill down into our former system to the data we wanted. Foremost  Farms is one of the first companies that does its own audits daily or every four to six hours, especially on new applications or plants, so we really needed better information. We also needed more complete data for state, federal and customer auditors. They each visit once or twice per year, but together this adds up to one or two visits per month. With the recorders, we'd have an operating signal that a tank had been washed, but it wouldn't indicate the tracking number."

Page 1 of 2 « Prev 1 | 2 View on one page
Share Print Reprints Permissions

What are your comments?

Join the discussion today. Login Here.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments