More from ISA's PAT Conference...

Dec. 6, 2005

Joydeep Ganguly and Real-time Bioprocess Monitoring and Control

"It isn't enough to have a more sophisticated way of telling you that you have a product that is crappy...that's not PAT. PAT is about consistently creating product that is NOT crappy." CBER monitors the biologicals industry. Talecris is a newly-formed company that inherited the assets of Bayer's plasma business. Automation needs to be put in where it is needed, Ganguly says. What is the automation pyramid? ...

Joydeep Ganguly and Real-time Bioprocess Monitoring and Control

"It isn't enough to have a more sophisticated way of telling you that you have a product that is crappy...that's not PAT. PAT is about consistently creating product that is NOT crappy." CBER monitors the biologicals industry. Talecris is a newly-formed company that inherited the assets of Bayer's plasma business. Automation needs to be put in where it is needed, Ganguly says. What is the automation pyramid? ---Batch Control and Reporting------- ---Historian, Sequencing--------------------- -------------Monitoring, Alarming------------------- ------------------------Batch Control----------------------- ^ Field devices(sensors, actuators, and local control) If you work with PAT concepts you can get far better quality. As an industry we are very good at finding out what went wrong after we lose a batch. What we need to do is get as good with keeping batches from going bad. Don't start PAT too big. Here's a case study, Talecris' Water For Injection (WFI) system ---an online PAT monitoring and automation case study Before PAT: Individual skid basis no historians or local historians with different formats look and feel widely different between skids no handshake between skids manual actuators,local gauges, bench process After PAT: Batch control and reporting for entire process Central data access, one format local or central control, same look and feel communication accross skids, connected and operated by the control system The bandwidth of PAT includes: --Monitoring via inline analytics --collection of data --analysis and correlation of data (continuous and batch) --control and mitigative actions in place We decided to start small...instead of trying to do the entire plant we just decided to do the WFI system... Before: WFI used 45% of the time in the process Request by production to use the WFI system Call QC, take sample from the distribution line Ensure no other user wants WFI Check TOC, conductivity and Temperature Water released at risk If water experiences high TOC in the interim, the batch is lost After: Communication at systems level Production control system communicates with Utilities control system online TOC, conductivity, and temperature on utilities control system confirms WFI good online totalizer verifies usage messages back and forth logged realtime quality assurance, valves to production close on "bad" WFI correlation on information online entire gamut of PAT deployed PAT is not, according to the FDA, implementation of process analyzers. What we got from WFI case study: Real time quality assurance WFI management electronic electronic reporting allows for 'realtime' release of WFI Implemented and fully validated with 1+ yerar of peroation experience Reduced manual sampling Bottom line: $500,000 per year, not including cost of batches saved ($3-4 million a year) So very simple can have a huge increase for the bottom line.