Voices: Boyes

Are You Ready for Process Control?

Editor in Chief Walt Boyes asserts that today's tools have shifted our viewpoint and that process automation professionals need to care more about the process itself, and not just the controls.

By Walt Boyes

We're worried about our jobs, but as regular CONTROL contributor Dick Morley pointed out during our panel discussion at ISA 2004, we aren’t really losing them to China. Ironically, China itself is losing the same kinds of jobs to automation as we are. It is all about productivity. One-hundred years ago, it took over half the population of the U.S. to feed us. Now less than 5% of the population is involved in farming. Farmers were concerned about many things we take for granted. We’re in the enviable situation of having the first society where even the poor have television and cars, and where access to high-speed data transmission is a cutting-edge civil right. The average life expectancy has increased more than 30 years in the past century and now we can afford to be worried about lots of things like affordable health care, and specialized education for all. This is the effect of the increased productivity that we, who work in process automation, have created. As a society, we’ve moved on. And, as process automation professionals, we have to move on too. What people in our profession need to care moor about today is the process itself, and not just the controls.

First came reliable sensors and final control elements. Then came control loops, followed by distributed control systems and SCADA—all to give us a real-time picture of the state of the controls. From this picture, the operator and the process engineers were supposed to be able to infer that their process was running right, because the loops were all “right and tight.” As we all know, this wasn’t necessarily so. The gap between the data from the control system and the data from the lab and quality control was huge, and sometimes seemed an uncrossable divide.

Loop tuning, and advanced process control software, predictive maintenance and asset management are the productivity tools of the future, not controls. Field instruments and final control elements have been made such that reliability and uptime are assumed, not issues. Where previously, we measured the flow in a control loop, now we want to see not just the flow, but also the pump speed, the motor temperature, the vibration level and the torque necessary to open and close the control valve, and many more parameters. Recently, Siemens sent Paul Studebaker, Editor in Chief of Plant Services magazine, and the former occupant of this space, a list of the over 4,000 data tags that you can get out of a “simple” drive unit. All of these can be analyzed by predictive maintenance software, and translated into work tags that can keep a plant from unplanned shutdowns and maximize availability. And now we care much more about how to control the process than how to make the controls work.

This is an order of magnitude change. Taken individually, each loop may be working as well as it can, yet the process as a whole may be operating at far less than optimum throughput and efficiency. Today’s tools have shifted our viewpoint.

So what does this mean? The business of making instruments function is now a technician’s job. Automation engineers are much more useful connecting plant-floor systems to the enterprise asset management and supply chain systems than troubleshooting an obnoxious level measurement. Process engineers can now have more direct control over how the process as a whole works, because the instrumentation layer is more transparent, and increasingly interoperable. By our own incredible productivity, we’ve changed our jobs.

More from this voice


ISA100.11a: Half Baked to a Schedule

If this Standard's Not Done, It Shouldn't Be Leaving the Oven


What Is To Be Done?

Who’s Going to Step Up and Create A Global Infrastructure Computer Emergency Response Team?


It Looks Like Up to Me…

The Process Industries Will Be Among the Least Affected of the Industrial Verticals by the Global Economic Meltdown


So You Can’t Retire—Now What?

If Your 401K or Pension Plan Has Lost Its Value, Take a Look at Your Skills and Your Training. Now May Be the Time to Look at CAP or CCST Training


What Will It Take to Keep Us Cyber–Safe?

How Are Different Companies in the Automation Industry Approaching Cybersecurity Issues? Are They Working Towards Protecting Their Assets?


It’s Not Just a Job

Welcome to the Hotel Automation. You Can Check Out but You Can Never Leave


How Safe is Safe? How Secure is Secure?

Functional Security: a Convergence of the Disciplines of Functional Safety and Control System Cybersecurity


Save the WBF

If You Care About 21st-Century Manufacturing, Go to the Website and Join WBF. We Need the “How” as Much or More Than We Need the “Why”


Another Major Safety Fail

There’s No Way to Tell If the Safety System Would Have Worked, or Did Work, Because Major Parts of It Were Turned Off


Functional Safety and Security- It's Cultural

Fostering a "Safety and Security Culture" in Our Workplaces


Creating Functional Security and Safety

We Still Have Not Managed to Create Whatever Culture We Need to Eliminate the Majority of Safety and Security Failures


Creating a Safety and Security Culture

The Process Manufacturing Industries Are Inherently Dangerous. Accident Still Happen, Plants Blow Up, and People Get Injured


Shrink-Proof Your Career

Read This Article and Find Out Why Boyes Says That Automation Professionals Have Been Less Hurt by the Recession Than Other Professionals


Opportunity Out of Crisis

What Would Happen if ISA's Leadership Began to Creatively Restructure and Reorganize the Organization?


ISA: What Is There to Do?

ISA's Executive Board Needs to Hire a Turnaround Specialist, Not Another Association Manager - or Divvy Up the Money and Go Home


Functional Security–Walking the Walk

When It Comes to Functional Security, How Do You Handle Security Updates?


Airport Kabuki and Functional Security

What do 9/11, the Detroit Bomber and ICS Security Have in Common?


Blocking and Tackling Are Still Required Skills

It Is Sometimes Easier to Get Classes on Advanced Process Control Than on the Basics of General Instrumentation and Control


Control Systems and the Great Toyota Fail

Toyota Is Simply Not Bulletproof as Advertised. We, as All Auto Makers, Aren't Willing to Pay Enough for Failures Not to Happen


Let's Do One for the End Users!

We Got Us a Wireless Standards War, and End Users Really Hate Standards Wars