Voices: Boyes

You better know more!

There is excellent training out there, provided by trainers who aren’t vendors, and don’t have the barely hidden agenda of wanting to sell you stuff.

By Walt Boyes, Editor in Chief

YOU KNOW IT, I know it. In story after story, we’ve talked about how critically important it is for process automation professionals to get out of the “instrumentation” or “automation” mindset. Last month, we showed you the oncoming train of changes you will have to master. But are you listening?

The ControlGlobal.com Web Poll we ran in August makes me think maybe not. Employers don’t often pay for training courses that enhance your marketability any more. The bean counters point out that people who get additional training often leave for better jobs and better pay, so companies have eliminated that perk. The more fools they, because they just wind up paying more to hire trained outside talent, instead of growing it from within and paying you enough to stay.

Since you mostly have to come up with the loot yourselves, we asked you to tell us how much you’d pay for a day’s worth of good automation training.

I am a little stunned at the answers.

Over half of you reported that you wouldn’t pay at all. Some of you (18%) used the excuse that you didn’t have time for training. You can use all your coming free time when you get laid off for not being current in your profession, then.

Others (33%) reported that they expect vendors to train them for free. Well, vendors have noticed that training and support could be a profit center, and they are starting to charge for training. That strategy won’t work either.

At least half of you have your heads in the sand. And don’t give me the “we can’t afford it ourselves,” wheeze either. According to our Salary Survey (Par for the Course, June 2005) the annual salary of an average control professional isn’t low. Automation professionals are well paid, on the whole. Even technicians and mechanics who work in automation are well paid.

There is excellent training out there, provided by trainers who aren’t vendors, and don’t have the barely hidden agenda of wanting to sell you stuff. One of the best suppliers of training is ISA, but ISA training isn’t free. A day’s worth of high quality training from ISA will set you back between $300 and $500 if you are a member; 41% of you reported that you’d pay that much.

But all of that 41% of you aren’t taking training courses, or ISA and the other third-party training companies would be overwhelmed.

Most third-party training organizations are in business to make money by training you for the challenges the twenty-first century will pose to the process automation profession. This is a good thing. People should get paid for what they do. But you also have to pay for what you get. It doesn’t appear to me that many of you want to.

Since most of you appear to be serious skinflints, maybe we ought to start lobbying ISA to make their training available at much lower cost to members. So, if you are an ISA member, you might get a day’s training for $50 instead of $500. ISA could make this an incredibly valuable member benefit, and use it to reverse the decade-long trend of fewer members each year. I think a lot more of you would fork over the membership fee if you got standards, training and such at vastly reduced prices.

If you think this is a good idea, tell ISA’s President Don Zee at president@isa.org, and then put your money where your mouths are.

More from this voice


Top 50 Automation Companies for 2011

The Economic Recovery Is Serene. Meet The 2011 Top 50 Leaders, Find Out How the Automation Market Stands And Learn Our Predictions of What's Coming Next


Them as Can, Do

Informing the Government of the Problem Is Good, but It Might Be Better for ISA to Spend Some Serious Money Doing Something About It


The world according to…

There may be no going back to the days when people believed that ISA was the voice of the end user, but if it wants to carve out new territory for itself, it needs to put money back into niche groups.


The virtues of simplicity

If we can design higher level development tools, both hardware and software, all the way down to kids’ toy level, imagine what we’re about to see for design tools for professional automation applications.


The summertime blues

CONTROL Editor in Chief Walt Boyes prepares for another round of User Group Madness meetings and says he’d like to see creation of an unbiased user group run by end users of many different products.


The Usual Suspects Win the Readers' Choice Awards!

The Question Isn't Who Won, but Rather Why Do They Win and How Do They Do It


The Nice Thing About Standards

The Burden of the Costs of Working With Multiple Standards Is Placed on the Shoulders of End Users


The Mobile Worker -- There Are 100 Apps for That!

There Are Lots of Mobile Worker Tools, and They're Allowing Even the Smallest Companies to Have All the Benefits of Mobility


The Lowdown on Radar Level Measurement

Free-Air or Guided-Wave -- Which Do You Use When?


The League of Competent People

The World Needs Saving and Only We Can Save It by Working Together. Lets Start Investing in STEM Education and Jobs


The Horse with Stripes

IT Security Professionals Profess to Be “Industrial Cyber Security ," Yet, It Takes More to Function Properly in the Industrial Controls Environment


The Future and YOU

Manufacturing Isn’t Going Away, Toffler Pointed Out, Any More Than American Agriculture Went Away A Hundred Years Ago


The Elephant in the Room

There’s an Elephant in the Wireless Room


The Building Blocks of Plant Performance

Instrument Data, Unified Networks and Intuitive HMI Don't Mean Much Without Each Other


The Big Technological Content Mountain

We're in the Process of Curating the Best Content on the Web for You


The Beltway Bandits and Cybersecurity

The Obama Administration's Executive Order Mandating Improved Cybersecurity for Critical Infrastructure Seems to Have Taken Us All Back Five Years


The Automation State

ARC Advisory Group and Control Take the Pulse of the Process Industries and Present It to You in the Automation Index


Take one for the team!

Organizations that only serve declining memberships are missing the point. The number of automation professionals isn’t declining; it is the number of them who feel the need to be included that’s declining.


Start SIL Calculations Early for Safety Success

Make Sure to Do Your SIL Ealry to Get them Right


Sometimes You Just Have to Let Go

ISA Has Decided to Use the Compliance Institutes as a Way to Recover the Lost Revenue from the Dying ISA Show