Voices: Feedback

Reader Feedback: Not Exactly PC-Based

PLCs and PACs Are More Robust and Include More Control Capabilities Than Those Offered Through PC-Based Control

By Dan Malyszko

I worked with Noosa Yoghurt to implement the process control solution discussed in the June article, "Process Automation, Controls Boost Production at Yogurt Plant ." While most of the details on the application are accurately described within the article, this particular application does not use PC-based control. Noosa uses a Rockwell Automation PlantPAx process control system built on a server and thin-client architecture. The actual control resides within a programmable automation controller (not a PC), despite how it's referenced in the article.

In my experience, PC-based control takes the control functions found on a programmable controller, encapsulates them in software and executes program tasks and I/O communications on the PC's processor along with other overhead related to the host operating system.

PLCs and PACs, on the other hand, are more robust and include more control capabilities than those offered through PC-based control. These could include motion control, integrated safety and advanced PID process control. At Noosa, the PAC-based PlantPAx platform provides the ability to add additional I/O, controllers and servers without adversely affecting the base characterized architecture of the system. This flexibility would not be possible within a PC-based system.

Dan Malyszko
Director of Operations, Malisko Engineering Inc.
dmalyszko@malisko.com

More from this voice

Title

Reader Feedback: Old Dogs Learning New Tricks

Why Are We Still Using the Same Sample Preparation Techniques That We Used 40 Years Ago?

01/14/2014

Reader Feedback: Why Is Alarm Management Such a Problem?

What's the Cost of Best Practice Alarm Management?

01/14/2014

An Alarming Disconnect?

The Values of Alarm Limits Are the Biggest Single Factor Governing Alarm Performance

02/14/2014

Cyber Vulnerabilities

Defending Targeted Attacks Is a Higher Bar. Focus on Prevention Alone Is Probably a Mistake

02/14/2014

Boiler Tuning Question

What Is the Best Method to Tune PID Values for Three-Element Drum Level Control in the Boiler?

02/14/2014

Reader Feedback: Replacing a Field Device

Is the 3 a.m., Sunday Morning Replacement the Killer App?

03/05/2014

Reader Feedback: Pervasive Sensing

Our Vision of Pervasive Sensors Encouraged Us to Find Innovative Ways to Not Just Power Sensors

03/05/2014

Reader Feedback: No Complete Disconnect for Nuclear Plants?

You Can't Isolate a Nuclear Power Plant from Any External Data Communications

04/07/2014

Reader Feedback: When Should You Calibrate Your Industrial Devices?

A Reader Says "You Should Calibrate Your Instruments With the Frequency You Established in [Your] Plan, and Never Go Longer Than a Year"

04/07/2014

Reader Feedback: Lambda Tuning: Use It or Lose It?

Helpful If Readers Could Get Better Information Than What's Listed in The Last "Control Update" Under: "Cascade Control Recommendation Tips" in Greg McMillan's "Control Talk" Blog

05/02/2014

Reader Feedback: No Unified Fieldbus Standard, Ever?

Unified Standard Solely Exist Because Automation Vendors Will Always Want That Part of Their Solutions Strategy to Be Uniquely Theirs

08/18/2014

Reader Feedback: Not Exactly PC-Based

PLCs and PACs Are More Robust and Include More Control Capabilities Than Those Offered Through PC-Based Control

08/18/2014