Voices: Feedback

Reader Feedback: When Should You Calibrate Your Industrial Devices?

A Reader Says "You Should Calibrate Your Instruments With the Frequency You Established in [Your] Plan, and Never Go Longer Than a Year"

By Armando Farfán

[This comment appeared on the ControlGlobal LinkedIn page referencing senior technical editor Dan Hebert's column, "Calibration Can Be Conditioned-Based."]

If your process is involved in quality standards, such as BRC, HCCP, etc., then you should calibrate your instruments with the frequency you established in [your] plan, and never go longer than a year. Just try to minimize your critical control points, be smart, work hard, and you will find a thin and adequate list.
If you're not suffocated by quality, first of all you should have this basic element: a list of plant instruments with their criticality (high, medium, low). Such criticality must be clearly established in your main maintenance manual [in terms of] impact on production, impact on environment, level of safety and health risks, etc.

Once you reduce your entire list to a handful, its time to evaluate the inspection period for such instruments.

Remember the "bathtub" figure "percent fails against time" for electronics equipment: high percentage in the first hours of life, steady figure during the working life, and high percentage in the final stage of its life.

This figure tells you, "Take your hands out of the instruments unless they show signs of malfunction." In other words, if it works, don´t mess with it. The signs of malfunction could be established from a condition-based monitoring routine inspection period. At the end, I agree with controlglobal.com.

Armando Farfán
PLC Network plant in Tucumán

More from this voice

Title

Boiler Tuning Question

What Is the Best Method to Tune PID Values for Three-Element Drum Level Control in the Boiler?

02/14/2014

Basics of Analyzer Systems Busted!

You're Right. Here's the Correct Wording

11/03/2011

Automation Apps, Gaming Systems and Thermodynamic Steam Quality

Readers Ask for Clarification on Some of Our Latest Articles

06/07/2011

Automation and Fukushima: Not So Fast

A Reader Responds to Liptak's Article on Fukushima Saying That We Have No Reason to Suspect That the Instruments Did Not Operate Correctly. Liptak Responds

05/01/2013

Answer to Our Question of the Month

Would You Pay for Outside Help to Address Cybersecurity Issues?

11/03/2011

Analog or Digital Output?

Do You Prefer Analog or Digital Output to Monitor Operating Parameters? If you Haven't Checked Out the ControlGlobal Discussion Group on LinkedIn, You Should.

09/05/2013

An Update on Liptak and Shinskey

Greg Shinskey Continues to Do Consulting and Bela Liptak Talks on Optimization and Safety

02/06/2012

An Alarming Disconnect?

The Values of Alarm Limits Are the Biggest Single Factor Governing Alarm Performance

02/14/2014

A Cybersecurity Wiki?

There Should Certainly Be a Wikipedia-Like Site for Security Professionals to Turn To for Proven, Tested Remedies and Suggestions

09/01/2011