FeedHome > Articles > Inside Fieldbus
Voices: Inside Fieldbus
Instrinsic Safety Obsolete Yet?
Like Most End Users, I Truly Value the Credibility and Security That Organizations Such as Factory Mutual, the Canadian Standards Association, CENELEC and Their Ilk Bring to the Devices We Use in Hazardous Environments. But Perhaps One Practice is Ready to Be Relegated to the ISA Museum of How We Used to Do Things. Here’s Why.
ControlGlobal.com
By John Rezabek,
Contributing Editor
Why do we install an intrinsically safe instrument system? One reason is the ability to do “live work,” such as connecting and disconnecting an instrument for calibration or troubleshooting. The other reason is the significant likelihood that the area where an instrument is located routinely has a flammable or explosive mixture of fuel and air present. We’re at a point today where, in many cases, both of these needs are going or have gone away already.
There was a day when a cloud of hydrocarbon vapor could unexpectedly emerge from a sewer in a refinery or petrochemical plant. “Knock-out” drums, separators and storage tanks all require periodic blow-down to remove accumulated water, and the condensate, basic sediment and water were usually accompanied by flammable liquids.
Furthermore, 20 years ago, interface detection was imprecise at best, and virtually no one applied any microwave or capacitance detectors to achieve a better “cut.” Every day, many times a day, slugs of flammable liquids headed down the drain on the way to in-plant treatment systems.
Then about 15 years ago, the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) went into effect. Refineries and other process plants that had to be in compliance spent many millions installing new closed sewer systems, which serviced practically every hydrocarbon-containing vessel that previously drained to the sewer. And, since the separation and treatment facilities that treated the material were limited in size and scope, greater discipline was applied when any such vessel was drained.
Regulations dealing with fugitive emissions also have been in play for some time, and most of us are subject to Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR). In my plant, a specialty contractor who checks every valve stem, pump seal and flange in a Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAPS) service, comes in at least quarterly for an inspection. “Sniffers,” as we call them, seek out leaks with sensitive detection equipment, and we’re bound by regulation to fix anything found on a strict schedule.
One consequence of these relatively new practices, I would suggest, is that many plants no longer have any bonafide “Zone 1” areas. Below-grade areas, where heavier-than-air flammables can accumulate can be minimized, and we can avoid installing instruments in the few genuinely “Zone 0” or “Division 1” areas we still have. Furthermore, such areas require an entry permit for any personnel to enter, essentially the same effort as a hot work.
Another factor that reduces or removes the need for IS systems is digitally integrated instruments. Newer plants are being built from the ground up to allow digital access to all instruments, whether through a standalone asset management system or the DCS/host system itself. If routine calibrations and diagnostics are checked from the control house using wireless Ethernet to the house or wireless HART to individual devices, even opening an enclosure to hook up a test device can be eliminated. With the exception of the hopefully rare instances where a field device needs to be replaced, I can think of very few situations when one would ever need to lift a wire.
The emergence of digitally integrated instruments, stricter environmental regulations and wireless access to diagnostics are converging to make “live maintenance in normally hazardous atmospheres” a rare occurrence. Shouldn’t end users ponder whether the value once delivered by an onshore IS installation is still worth the added complexity, effort and expense?
More Voices
Instrinsic Safety Obsolete Yet?
03/07/2008
Like Most End Users, I Truly Value the Credibility and Security That Organizations Such as Factory Mutual, the Canadian Standards Association, CENELEC and Their Ilk Bring to the
Devices We Use in Hazardous Environments. But Perhaps One Practice is Ready to Be Relegated to the ISA Museum of How We Used to Do Things. Here’s Why.
Anyone watching your assets?
06/04/2007
Every system benefits from having properly trained individuals examining diagnostics and error messages, but fieldbus has the power to free those savvy techs from tedious hours watching screens.
One bus for all?
05/06/2007
When it comes to applications that allow our basic controls to function, system lock-ups are intolerable, so it pays to examine the heritage of fieldbus and carefully analyze the market that shaped it.
Users driving the bus
04/05/2007
Contributing Editor John Rezabek provides commentary on end-user participation in councils and committees, formulating directions and priorities as a valuable service to the supplier community.
Not jazzed about fieldbus? Try it
03/01/2007
Columnist John Rezabek notes that most systems now have excellent engineering tools and allow easy integration of fieldbus devices, so there are ever-fewer excuses not to try some truly distributed control.
Still pondering whither fieldbus?
02/01/2007
In this month's installment of On the Bus, Contributing Editor John Rezabek predicts HART devices will work so well that your career may be over before you can justify the cost to replace them with fieldbus.
Physical layer diagnostics: Part II
01/05/2007
In this month’s installment of On the Bus, process control specialist John Rezabek summarizes the current and soon-to-be-released offerings of four of the leading suppliers of physical-layer hardware.
Physical layer diagnostics: Who needs them?
12/11/2006
In this month’s installment of On the Bus, process control specialist John Rezabek explains the difficulties of getting a quality installation of physical-layer hardware for fieldbus diagnostics.
New maintenance strategy: Don’t break it!
11/01/2006
CONTROL contributing editor and pioneering Foundation fieldbus user John Rezabek provides analysis and commentary on the ultimate preventive, predictive, proactive and preemptive maintenance strategy.
Data validation: Jewel in the fieldbus crown?
10/10/2006
Many users and most suppliers to the industry see process availability as the big payout benefit of Foundation Fieldbus (FF) diagnostics—a good portion of it realized through data validation.
Wean process off the redundancy pacifier
09/08/2006
With Foundation fieldbus, the old redundancy paradigm no longer applies, so where should we apply it to achieve the fault tolerance we need? Contributing Editor John Rezabek provides analysis and commentary.
Why users need one twisted-pair bus
08/07/2006
We have a new contributing editor, John Rezabek, taking over the On the Bus column on ControlGlobal.com. Rezabek is a well-known fieldbus expert and process control specialist at ISP Corp. in Lima, Ohio.
Fieldbus in biopharma applications, Part 1
07/14/2006
This article highlights issues associated with the installation of a multiple-fieldbus control system at a pharma processing facility and talks about its implications for handling an entire manufacturing suite.
The FAT is the problem
07/14/2006
End users need to revisit their expectations of the Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) and accept that not every loop needs to be tested in order to implement a successful fieldbus project.
Take the Foundation Fieldbus Lifecycle Benefits Survey 2006
07/05/2006
The purpose of this survey is to ascertain a more accurate view of the operational, maintenance, and engineering benefits related to Foundation fieldbus and how they relate to a business value proposition for end users.
Show me the installations
06/07/2006
End users are beginning to realize that it’s the maintenance and diagnostic information capabilities of devices that will provide the life cycle savings and justification for installing new fieldbus technologies.
Fieldbus technology's next biggest hurdle
05/05/2006
If you’re a skid or modular assembly manufacturer and want to differentiate yourself from the crowd, offering digital communications and fieldbus technology could be the ticket.
Unified theory of everthing
04/07/2006
The big problem is that control systems don’t all support OPC the same way or to the same degree, so there’s often no consistent way to capture and transmit even simple items like the status bit of a transmitter.
Networking data not for dummies
03/14/2006
By using process variable (PV) and Status information only, you can effectively take a small sip from the fire hose of information available with today’s smart transmitters. Be careful you don’t get soaked!
Is FDT good for fieldbus and device networks?
02/10/2006
CONTROL’s Ian Verhappen, Chair of the Fieldbus Foundation User Group, looks at the latest battleground in the Fieldbus Wars. Is this Fieldbus Wars II or can FDT/DTM and EDDL work together?
The house that function blocks built
12/20/2005
Ian Verhappen, Chair of the Foundation Fieldbus User Group and Vice President of Standards for ISA, offers his perspective and experience on what’s happening in the world of industrial fieldbus.
Intrinsically safe fieldbus applications
11/22/2005
This article takes a look at ways companies get around limited power and other hazardous environment barriers to connect more fieldbus devices using a technology that goes beyond FISCO.
Largest Foundation fieldbus complex completed
11/10/2005
SECCO’s petrochem process facility goes from bare ground to on line in 27 months using a main instrument vendor to engineer and implement automation and control systems, and manage its multiple suppliers.
Training EPCs with whip, chair and gun
11/05/2005
Despite what we think, instrumentation and control is not a core component of most EPCs, but rather a necessary support service that sells the bread and butter of process and mechanical engineering.
Tips on installing a fieldbus safety system
10/21/2005
Even though standards allow sharing of the physical layer for safety and control communications, Parity Check columnist Ian Verhappen doesn't feel that too many users, if any, will mix the two systems.
Data dummies
10/21/2005
Ian Verhappen, Chair of the Foundation Fieldbus User Group and Vice President of Standards for ISA, offers his perspective and experience on what’s happening in the world of industrial fieldbus.
Out here in the fieldbus
10/12/2005
Ian Verhappen, Chair of the Foundation Fieldbus User Group and Vice President of Standards for ISA, offers his perspective and experience on what’s happening in the world of industrial fieldbus.
Tips for trouble-free fieldbus
09/22/2005
DigitalField Insider Columnist Ian Verhappen notes that the most important measure that can be taken to prevent difficulties with a given fieldbus or digital networking project is protocol communication.
Keep the bus from slowing to a crawl
08/31/2005
Ian Verhappen, Chair of the Foundation Fieldbus User Group and Vice President of Standards for ISA, offers his perspective and experience on the digital fieldbus network in this exclusive for DigitalField Insider.
Justifying HART investments to management
08/30/2005
In putting together a case for investing in HART technology, maintenance and operations departments need to stress to management the situations that won't occur as a result of using its capabilities.
Fieldbus Wars continue: EDDL vs. FDT/DTM
08/23/2005
Fieldbus technology expert Dick Caro predicts that as Ethernet-based control networks converge into the domain of fieldbus, there will eventually be a conflict between OPC/DX, FDT/DTM, and EDDL.
HART Communication – Dispelling the Myths: Part II
06/28/2005
This "special to the web" article is designed to increase your knowledge about the HART Field Communications Protocol. Find out its benefits and dispel the myths surrounding this powerful technology.
The flavors of industrial Ethernet
06/28/2005
Ian Verhappen, Chair of the Foundation Fieldbus User Group and Vice President of Standards for ISA, offers his perspective and experience on the digital fieldbus network in this exclusive for DigitalField Insider.
On the bus: Design hurdles to fieldbus technology
05/30/2005
Ian Verhappen, Chair of the Foundation Fieldbus User Group and Vice President of Standards for ISA, offers his perspective and experience on the digital fieldbus network in this exclusive for DigitalField Insider.