Voices: Larson

Back in CONTROL!

Just when he thought he was out, Group Publisher and VP of Content, Keith Larson, is pulled back in. Check out "Wind-up," his new monthly column positioned as a final punctuation for CONTROL magazine.

Group Publisher Keith LarsonBy Keith Larson, Publisher

WHEN WALT Boyes, current editor-in-chief of Control, asked me to once again pen a regular column in this magazine, it was difficult not to think of Michael Corleone’s vain attempts to escape the underworld that had come to define him.

For me too, this writing marks a return to a world that I’d never really left. Long-time Control readers might remember my most recent columns as editor-in-chief, now some 10 years ago. During the intervening years, I’ve looked after the business side of this publishing pursuit, launched new magazines in other markets, and even briefly flirted with the competition.

But the world of process automation has always been my first love. It gets under your skin, and, as John Berra, now CEO of Emerson Process Management, once remarked to me: “There’s a relatively limited number of people who really care about this stuff.” Come to realize, I’m one of them.

The start of this new column, positioned as a final punctuation mark to the editorial pages of Control, seems a propitious opportunity to briefly benchmark the current state of our industry from my perspective, and to describe some of the trends and pressures I see driving it forward.

"Just when I thought that I was out,
they pull me back in!"

-- Al Pacino,
The Godfather III


From where I sit today, the most significant of these intertwined trends include the ongoing consolidation and globalization of the manufacturing industry (and of the automation suppliers that serve them); the movement upward of process automation innovation from process control and optimization to execution-level tasks; and the growing need (and ability) of the process automation community to package and extend the reach of its expertise.

Following the pattern of many maturing industries before us, I believe the manufacturing industry, as well as the supply side of the automation market, will continue to consolidate and stratify among an ever-smaller number of global multinationals and smaller niched and regional players. Including the historically discrete-oriented automation players, for instance, there now remain fewer than 10 global options at the platform/architecture level.

And, if history is any guide, that’s still too many. Think of the post-consolidation ERP market. Until rather recently, a panoply of best-of-breed companies focused on a variety of specialized tasks from demand forecasting to MRP. Today, best-of-breed at the ERP level has all but given way to the integrated offerings of SAP and a short list of rivals.

Further, when it comes to process automation, I believe the battle for platform dominance is poised to unfold not in process automation proper but around the tasks traditionally defined as part of the manufacturing execution space—the level of integration, control and coordination between ERP and plant-floor automation systems.

The fight for ERP is over, and any number of companies can do control. But the automation platform providers that will win the process industry’s allegiance in the longer term will be those that can finally and cost-effectively unify heterogeneous plant-floor control systems and, in turn, provide a means for maximizing economic productivity of manufacturing assets. Not temperatures or pressures, nor even utilization or availability metrics, the process industries need—and the winning platform suppliers will deliver—actionable measures of real-time economic performance. Nothing new here in principle, but feasibility may finally be poised to catch up with imagination.

Let me add that none of this systems focus is intended to minimize or understate the importance of ongoing innovation in the realm of field instrumentation. Wireless communications, for example, will make increasing numbers of measurements more cost-effective than ever before. But the ability to interpret and act on this new data based on its economic impact will be the ultimate differentiator.

Finally, any overview of the state of the process automation industry would be incomplete without acknowledging the graying of our ranks, especially in the U.S., as well as the overall decline of manufacturing both in terms of GDP and employment. Like farming before us, some of this is inevitable and a testament to the automation profession’s success in improving productivity. But, like farming, manufacturing must still be done—even if with fewer engineering resources. That means that the remaining engineering expertise needs to be better captured and retained, packaged and redistributed.

Ultimately, the means, opportunity and responsibility for capturing and leveraging that expertise will come to rest with our automation platform providers. Increasingly, we’ll rely on them to embed intelligence in field devices, package engineering expertise in the form of application software, and provide the means by which operating companies can capture and retain knowledge specifically germane to their operations.

As long as there is process manufacturing, the need for process automation will persist. But just how to best leverage the expertise of fewer process automation professionals over a broader array of manufacturing assets is the practical challenge—and opportunity.

More from this voice


Back in CONTROL!

Just when he thought he was out, Group Publisher and VP of Content, Keith Larson, is pulled back in. Check out "Wind-up," his new monthly column positioned as a final punctuation for CONTROL magazine.


Invensys ups enterprise integration ante

It's too early to tell the Visicalcs of today from the Microsoft Offices of tomorrow, but, for now, Invensys Process Systems appears headed in a positive direction.


Connectivity that counts

Today, much fruitful activity in the process automation realm is on the meaningful integration of applications with each other, so that true knowledge and information—and not just more data—is the outcome.


The rise of the User Group meeting

Whether they’re called fairs, exchanges, summits, worlds, symposia, or user conferences, hosting or attending at least one such event each year is now a routine part of how industrial automation gets done.


Life of a salesman

Always ready with a joke and a smile, Harvey M. Warren was a beloved and respected presence throughout the eastern U.S., serving marketing clients in the industrial automation industry for nearly 20 years.


Best-practices gulf is poised to widen

As best-in-class, global manufacturing companies strive toward standardizing systems and improving business processes, the gulf between top-performers and technology laggards continues to widen.


What kind of training do you really need?

As supervisors and employees from outside the research environment are surveyed on thesis-based degree programs, continuing education expectations will converge—and not toward those of the supervisors.


Industrial networking for the rest of us

As networking technology and its applications continue to advance, the greatest innovations today are not in the networks per se, but in making them easier and more foolproof to implement.


Yokogawa shedding quiet company image

While it’s difficult to gauge quantitatively where Yokogawa stands in its market-share quest, recent project wins reflect the aggressive moves the company is making to become a more dominant global leader.


The new energy opportunity

The changing energy landscape promises to keep process automation professionals quite busy for many years to come. Now, if we can just get that potential through to a few more idealistic adolescents…


ABB thriving in global sweet spot

ABB today faces a perfect storm of a different type. Its focus on power and productivity puts it squarely in the frenzied center of global industrial and infrastructure investment.


Integration across the fourth dimension

In the heavy continuous process industries, well-evolved simulation tools exist to aid in process design, but how well do they really integrate with the mechanical design tools they feed?


Of Family Trees and Brand Patriotism

Keith Larson talks about the results of or May survey. We asked Control subscribers to identify the current parent companies of different process automation brands. See the results.


On ‘Strange’ Loops and Plant Intelligence

Douglas Hofstadter asks in his recently published book, "I Am a Strange Loop," how anything as amorphous and mysterious as the “I” within each of our brains can exhibit any real power over the physical world.


Basic Skills Needed to Combat Alarm Woes

If we don’t have the foundation right, why are we surprised that operators are getting overwhelmed by alarms?


Is Latest Green Movement Sustainable?

Green being back in may well be the hook we need to get young people re-engaged in careers in engineering.


The Road Ahead: From Content to Community

Today, Control isn’t just a U.S.-focused print magazine, but an increasingly global and interactive community.


Building a 21st-Century Renaissance Engineer

By Creating a College from Scratch, We Can Approach Education in a Whole New Way That Will Best Serve the Engineers of the New Millennium


Life on the Edge of the Idea Economy

Automation Professionals Will Be the Agents and Enablers of the Transition to an Economy Based on Ideas and Information


A Measured Perspective

Measurement Can Be as Much a Challenge for Magazines as for the Process Industries.