Voices: Magazine Exclusives

Software that Reduces Maintenance of Multivariable Predictive Controllers

The Software Is Easy to Use. It Takes About 30 Minutes to Create

By Charles and James Cutler

The degradation of the models used by Multivariable Predictive Controllers (MPC) is primarily due to changes in the PID controller's tuning or configuration.  The physical plants vessels, piping, and inventories which set the basic dynamics do not change significantly with time.  As the models degrade, the performance of the controller eventually reaches such a low point that the controller is either turned off or the process unit is retested to upgrade the model.  Turning the controller off is not desirable, since the full value of the controller is lost.   Retesting is usually a high cost event because it requires engineering support from a contractor or some other part of the organization.  Many times the poor performance of the controller is due to equipment failure such as a valve becoming stuck or losing its plug.  The loss of one key valve that requires a shutdown to fix, forces the controller to be put on manual which can destroy the entire MPC's model and cause the controller to be turned off.

Also Read: Model Predictive Control - Past, Present and Future, Part 1

Cutler Technology's Universal Process Identification (UPID) software will be used to demonstrate how the problems with PID configuration and tuning can be reduced to a minimum.  A depropanizer model will be used as the process example.  The independent manipulated variables in the model are the set points for the feed rate, the top pressure on the column, the tray 5 temperature (5 trays from top), and the heat medium flow to the reboiler.  The tray 5 temperature is controlled by manipulating the reflux to the column.  The top pressure controller by passes the overhead condensing system and sends the hot vapors directly to the overhead accumulator to increase the pressure.  The MPC on the column controls the top temperature and bottom temperature.  The differential pressure across the column and the valve position on the pressure controller are the main constraints.  These controlled variables are dependent variables in the controller's model.  The other dependent variables in the controller model in Display 1 are there to facilitate the rearrangement of the control matrix when it becomes prudent to put one or more of the PID controllers in manual in the MPC model.

In Display 1, it should be noted that the PV for a specific manipulated variables comes to 1.00, i.e. the PV comes to its setpoint.  The response of this PV for the other manipulated variable is zero or comes back to zero at steady state for the other manipulated variables.  This response is true because the manipulated variables are independent from one another.  The valve positions of the manipulated variables change to make this independence possible.

In Display 2 the Top Pressure PID controller has been switched to manual in the model.  The Top Pressure valve position becomes the manipulated variable.  The setpoint for the pressure replaces the valve position as a dependent variable and tracks the pressure PV.   During the summer when the cooling water temperature goes up, it becomes desirable to switch the pressure controller to manual, to tell the MPC that it needs to use the other manipulated variables to control the pressure on the column.  As can be seen in Display 2, all of the other manipulated variables have a significant effect on the pressure.  The MPC controller with the pressure PID controller in manual can completely close the valve on the bypass around the condensers.

Closing the valve permits the maximum cooling for the column.

The Tray 5 Temperature PID controller is switched to manual in Display 3   The PID controller on tray 5 temperature is a cascaded loop that moves the setpoint on the reflux to the column.  The MPC controller model in Display 3 has the reflux valve position as one of its independent manipulated variables.  
In Display 4, both the temperature PID controller and pressure PID controller are in manual.   The MPC model is significantly changed from the original model when all the setpoints were functioning.  There are many reasons PID controllers are switched to manual during the course of a run.  A run may last a number of years, so every effort should be made to keep MPC on control.  A controller may be switched to manual when a valve is sticking so frequently that it is putting cycles into the entire process unit.  The process piping may not have adequate by passes to permit the valves to be blocked in and removed for repaired.

In Display 5, the models for the key constraint CVs are compared for the four set point case and the two set point case.  The valve position responses are obviously different from the set point responses.  Major differences in the gains also exist for the setpoint versus setpoint responses.  When the configurations of the PID controllers within a multivariable controller are changed, it affects the entire controller model.

Changes in the process mode of operation may cause one or more controllers to become unstable.   The PID controllers must be tuned to gain stability.   The new tuning changes the MPC model.  In Display 6 the PID controllers have become unstable.  The software allows the PIDs controllers in the MPC model to be tuned to match the plants tuning as illustrated in Display 7.  The ability to change the PID controller's tuning and configuration in the MPC model to match the current conditions on the process unit can significantly increase the on stream factor, the quality of the MPC control, and the profitability of the controller.

The software is easy to use.  The six models that follow, took about 30 minutes to create.  The controller has fourteen dependent variables.  Seven of the dependent variables were dropped out of the displays to make them readable.

More from this voice


The Education of the 21st-Century Process Automation

The Plant of 2025 Is Going to Require a Different Kind of Operator and Engineer. Are Schools and Companies Up for the Challenge?


The Danger With Time Bombs

Can Your Software Vendor Lock Up Your Software so That You Have to Buy an Upgrade? Maybe Not


Stuxnet and the Paradigm Shift in Cyber Warfare

A Brief History of the Stuxnet Worm Including Its Targets, the Initial Findings, Possible Creators of the Worm and Its Effects


Something Old, Something New

Users of the Two Most Measured and Most Important Variables in Process Control—Temperature and Pressure—Are Benefiting from Added Intelligence, Software and Other New Technologies, but Everything Still Depends on Good Old-Fashioned Sensors and Well-Maintained Thermocouples and Resistance Temperature Detectors


Solar System Boosts Oil Field Output

Innovative Thermal Solar System Cuts Installation Costs, Increases Operating Efficiency and Reduces Maintenance for an Enhanced Oil Recovery Project


Software that Reduces Maintenance of Multivariable Predictive Controllers

The Software Is Easy to Use. It Takes About 30 Minutes to Create


Snapshots from the World of Innovation

Our Resident “Futurologist” Speculates on the Future of Disk Drives, Nanobots, and High-Frequency Sounds That Cut Both Ways


Situation Critical

Bad Human/System Relationships Can Quite Literally Blow Up in Everyone's Face


SEMS After Deepwater Horizon

Oil and Gas Operators Have a Lot to Do Before November 15, 2011, to Meet the New SEMS Requirements


Semiconductor Fab Clears Air with Intelligent Motor Control

Networked Recirculation Air Handlers Save Hardwiring and Programming Costs


Securing Your OPC Classic Control System

Independent Techniques for Ensuring Strong Security in Your System


Saving Energy at the Swimming Pool with VFDs

Variable-Frequency Drives Reduce Energy Costs and Protect Motors at South Windsor, Conn., Pool Complex


Safety, Security and Complex Systems in Critical Infrastructure Protection

The Global Critical Infrastructure Is Made Up of Complex Systems Which Are, In Turn, Made Up of Complex Systems Made Up of Simpler Systems


Safety Systems for Non-Engineers

What All the Hullabaloo Over Safety Instruments Systems Is About?


Safety Life-Cycle Planning

How Planning Can Provide Cost-Effective Design and Successful Project Execution


Robust Security Designed into WirelessHART

"Always On" Security One Key to WirelessHART Adoption


Robust Security Designed into WirelessHART

"Always On" Security One Key to WirelessHART Adoption


Roadmap for Best Practices in Manufacturing

Aberdeen Study Shows Direct Link between Improved Safety and Productivity


Risky Business--How to Optimize a Hydrocarbon Processing Plant

It's All About the Trade-Offs


Rethink Sample System Automation

Rethink Sample System Automation -- NeSSI Provides New Tools to Tackle the Challenges and Improve Performance