Voices: McMillan & Weiner

15 case-in-points of common control myths

In a time-proven tradition of subjecting everything to scrutiny and ridicule, columnists McMillan and Weiner offer up the following 15 examples used to help illustrate and demystify control mythology.

McMillan and WeinerBy Greg McMillan and Stan Weiner, PE

Greg: In our time-proven tradition of subjecting everything to scrutiny and ridicule, where I am scrutiny and Stan is ridicule, we offer the following control myths.

Stan: This should take no time at all, or less, if you prefer.

Greg’s List of Control Myths

  1. Auto tuners can compute controller tuning settings with an accuracy of more than one digit. Act surprised when unmeasured disturbances, load changes, valve stick-slip, and noise cause each result to be different. Look forward to the opportunity to play bingo with the second digit. 
  2. You can just dump all your historical data into an artificial neural network and get wonderful results. Forget about the same stuff that causes auto tuners to have problems, and use variables that draw straight lines because anything that smooth or well controlled must be important. Use the controlled variables (process variables) instead of the manipulated variables (controller outputs). Don’t try to avoid extraneous inputs or identification of the control algorithm instead of the process. If you want to purse a career in data processing, use every input you can find.
  3. Models can predict a process variable that isn’t measured in the field or lab. This is a great way to spur creativity in training an artificial neural network (ANN) and validate a first-principal model, plus it has the added bonus of the model never being wrong. Wait until your customers figure out something is wrong with the composition of your product. Discount as hearsay any suggestions that even the best models need periodic correction. 
  4. To reduce variability in process outputs (temperatures and compositions), keep all the process inputs (flows) constant. Keep believing that you can fix both the process inputs and outputs, and don’t accept the notion that process control must transfer variability from process outputs to process inputs to compensate for disturbances.
  5. Process control doesn’t apply to batch processes. Use that time-tested, fixed sequence. After all, batch cycle time is a tradition, and the golden batch sure looks shiny.
  6. Positioners shouldn’t be used on fast loops. This was true in the good old days of pneumatic positioners and analog controllers. Surely, digital positioners with tuning settings and digital, control-system scan times can’t make the original theoretical concerns less important than the practical issues of real valves. If you’d rather believe the controller outputs are the actual valve positions, and just want valve problems to slip by, save some bucks on your project, and only put positioners on slow loops. Just don’t stick around for start up.
    Control Talk

    Stan: Don’t call me Shirley. “If you really want to save money on positioners, then don’t put them on any valves smaller than 3 in. For even more fun, forget about rotary valves with weird spring ranges such as; 7.5 to 21 psig. Then stand in the control room and guess what the valve is doing.”[

  7. Pressure and temperature-compensated orifice flow measurements provide mass flow measurements. If your favorite vendors believe the composition in the pipeline is always exactly the composition stated in the process flow diagram and the equations are accurate for all operating conditions, then give them an achievement award for imaginative marketing.

    Stan’s List of Control Myths

  8. If you believe the vendor in Myth #5 was really looking out for you and your company’s best
    interests in measuring mass flow, you probably slept through that class in instrument school. This is about the nicest thing that we could say about you and the vendor. (Please note: when Greg wants to get me really upset, he begins talking or writing about orifice plates and other differential flow measuring devices.)
  9. If you’re using orifice plates for flow measurement and suspect there’s an unacceptable error, there’s no need to check the orifice plate. They’re made of stainless-steel, which means their holes’ sizes never change. Besides, it’s s a real pain to have to remove them from the piping.
  10. If your flow requirements increase, replace the control valve with one that has a larger Cv.
  11. Make sure you tune every level-control loop, so the level in the vessel stays at exactly 50%. 
  12. Never use a three-element boiler feed water system. When designing the level control system for a steam drum, keep it simple. Just make sure the operators understand that the load can’t be changed quickly, and chalk it up to a lack of sophistication. 
  13. We need to keep repeating this one every few years. As a director once told me; “If you’re going to buy instruments that don’t work, make sure they’re cheap”.
  14. If your company decides to modernize a unit by replacing the pneumatic instruments with a distributed control system (DCS), the controller settings can be transferred without any problems. 
  15. Integrating your basic process controllers and the plant safety system can reduce costs by using the same hardware, configuration, and maintenance. Make sure management understands that it almost always takes more than two or three failures to produce a spectacular explosion, fire, or release of toxic materials.

Greg: From time to time, our column may have a quote from special guest(s). Last month it was Groucho Marx. This month, it’s Wally and the Beave from the classic TV sitcom, Leave it to Beaver.


This Month's Puzzler

A vortex meter was working fine during water batching of a new process area. Suddenly it begins reading very erratically. When the sensor voltage was displayed on an oscilloscope, it was a squiggly mess. What happened? Send an e-mail with your answer, questions, or comments to The Puzzler.

Wally: Any executive with half a brain would realize that without experienced control people, myths rule.

Beave: I hope it’s not the dumb half.

Greg: On a personal note, I was glad to hear that there is a Hell, Minnesota, which means I was correct last summer in noting that Austin was “hotter than Hell.” I plan to go there some day, so I can brag that I have been “to hell and back.” And, if I take an airport limo, aptly named “hand basket,” I also can say “I’m going to hell in a hand basket.”

  About the Authors
Greg McMillan and Stan Weiner, PE bring their wits and more than 68 years of process control experience to bear on your questions, comments, and problems. Write to them at controltalk@putman.net.

More from this voice


15 case-in-points of common control myths

In a time-proven tradition of subjecting everything to scrutiny and ridicule, columnists McMillan and Weiner offer up the following 15 examples used to help illustrate and demystify control mythology.


35 Years of Extraordinary PID Innovations

The Best Tuning of a PID Controller Is Knowledge of the Process Dynamics


APC and Wireless Rabbits


Are you grounded in reality?

Control Talk columnists McMillan and Weiner get an insightful reply as to why a plant instrument engineer said the control schemes and instruments successfully used at other locations won't work in his plant.


Best of the best, Part 3

In the third installment of this series, Control Talk columnists Greg McMillan and Stan Weiner, PE, continue their interviews with the big names in process control. This time they talk with ISA Fellow Vernon Trevathan.


Best of the best, Part 4

Control Talk columnists McMillan and Weiner continue their interviews with the big names in process control. This time they talk with Bob Heider, adjunct professor at Washington University in St. Louis.


Bonkers vortex meter spells double trouble

Control Talk columnists Greg McMillan and Stan Weiner offer up a bit of humor along with the answer to April's Puzzler on why a vortex meter measuring toothpaste went bonkers.


Bringing Advanced Process Control Home

McMilland and Weiner Talk With Arnold Martin About Model-Predictive Control. Read the Column and Learn About Martin's Accomplishments and Perspective


Calibration Trends

McMillan and Weiner Ask Glenn Gardner, Fluke Product Planner, to Help Them Complete Their Perspective on Calibration by Taking a Look at Future Trends


Communication for the Ages

We Have Four Generations in the Work Place at the Same Time Each With Different Cultures, Skills, and Expectations


Control Loop Improvement

McMillan and Weiner Talk With Jacques Smuts About Improving Control Loops


Control Valve Innovations

McMillan and Weiner Asks Hans Baumann About His Most Notable Innovations in Control Valves.


Daytime talk is a hoot and a holler

McMillan and Weiner imagine a transcript of a control engineer on a daytime talk show and offer up the Top 10 reasons why you won’t find a model-based control text book anywhere in today’s college classroom.


Deal or No Deal

Greg McMillan and Stan Weiner bring their wits and more than 66 years of process control experience to bear on your questions, comments, and problems. Write to them at controltalk@putman.net.


Deltas Rule

Deltas Rule in the Equation for the Digital Implementation of the PID Algorithm


Diagnosing Final Control Elements

McMillan and Weiner Ask James Beall What Was the Biggest Step Forward that Helped Him Improve Valve Performance


Distilled Analysis of Interaction

Getting the Most Out of Your PID


Disturbing Remarks

The Memories of Loops Gone Bad and Processes Gone Wild


Don't Over Look PID in APC

That Old Stalwart PID Can Do a Lot of Heavy Lifting in Your Process Control Efforts


Downturn Turndown

Are People Going to Be Put to Work Improving the Rangeability of the Plant or Let Go to Save Short-Term Costs?