Voices: Montague

Energy Consumption Visibility Is First Step to Savings

Rigorous Models, Complete with Equipment Limitations and Emissions Constraints, Help Users Optimize Energy Costs

By Jim Montague

Yoko14 banner

Sometimes enlightenment just means a deeper understanding of what's already familiar. For example, process control applications have been so focused on performance optimization over the decades that energy consumption was sometimes an afterthought. Not anymore.

Today, process engineers are seeking every means possible to rein in high energy expenses, and Yokogawa Corp. of America and its partners are coming up with some innovative and easily applied ways to help. For instance, Visual MESA energy-management software from Soteica can help users examine and analyze their energy use much more closely and find efficiencies they couldn't before, according to Oscar Santollani, Soteica's CEO.

"Everyone wants to know how to leverage their existing infrastructure to assist operators and shift supervisors in reducing energy costs 24/7/365 within emissions constraints; solve their energy and carbon balances; and give their organization validated and consistent energy and emissions key performance indicators (KPIs)," said Santollani, who presented "Improving Energy Performance: Industrial Case Studies of Monitoring and Optimization" today at the 2014 Yokogawa Users Conference and Exhibition in Houston.

Start with First Principles

Because they're process control engineers, many users want to apply the same procedures to energy that they do to their regular applications. "They want to make the principles of process engineering seamlessly available through a rigorous, site-wide, real-time energy and emissions mathematical model like Visual MESA," said Santollani. "These principles consist of plant-wide mass and energy balances, including interactions among all energy subsystems, such as steam, boiler feed water, condensate, fuels, power, hydrogen, chilled water, etc. They also include first principles-based equipment models and thermodynamic calculations, as well as theoretical combustion calculations. These can all help improve optimization and economics. It's becoming extremely important for users to think about how entropy may affect economics."

Santollani added, "By applying rigorous first principles, such as mass and energy balance, you're ensuring sound engineering calculations as well as consistency. By including economics in the rigorous model, you're bringing real, money-generating KPIs to the control room and aligning operations with your company's profit and loss statement. And by including optimization in addition to simulation, you're fulfilling the true purpose of your decision-support systems."

However, before Visual MESA and other helpful energy-analysis software can be successfully deployed, Santollani added, they must pass the "reasonable operator's test." The software has to be able to run unattended and achieve typical uptimes of greater than 90% in both open-loop and closed-loop where applicable. "Also, it has to be measurement driven, but at the same time able to adapt to faulty measurements on the fly. Finally, the model must be able to be maintained over time."

Santollani reported that Visual MESA gives users several primary capabilities for improving energy performance, including utilities optimization, energy management KPI calculations, monitoring, auditing and accounting. He added that BP Ligen's facility recently implemented Visual MESA, which produced operational recommendations that added up to 2 to 4% of its energy costs.

"Utilities systems models can deliver a financial gain by reducing the impact of exceptions," said Santollani. "Having all the information of your site-wide utility systems, as well your equipment limits, your emission limits, your reliability constraints and your contracts in one model brings immediate value, and can serve up validated and consistent energy and emissions KPIs to the entire organization. Utilities have always been the ugly duckling of process control because no one really wanted to look at them. But they're a lot more attractive now because users can make some real gains and money by addressing them."

More from this voice

Title

Everything Old is New Again

A Specific Tool May Be obsolete, but the Mental Process That Went into Addressing the Problem It Solves Remains as Instructive as Ever

05/04/2008

Worry Wart

A Flood Around Your Ankles Is a Lot Different Than One Around Your Neck. So Pick Up Your Canoe and Get Moving

04/01/2008

A Willingness to Learn

You Can Teach an Old Dog New Tricks—and Old Editors and Engineers Too

03/20/2008

A Willingness to Learn

You Can Teach an Old Dog New Tricks—and Old Editors and Engineers Too.

03/07/2008

Watch Your Mouth

Did We Truly Need to Replace Programmable Logic Controllers with Programmable Automation Controllers? Why Not Just Call Them Computers and Leave It at That?

02/04/2008

Pace Yourself

Regenerative Thermal Oxidizers Become Popular. Oxydizer Projects Ranged between 5 to 7 per Year, Now 1 per Week

01/03/2008

Pulling Teeth

Maybe the U.K. could re-colonize us, so we could get OSHA’s process control-related divisions to be more responsive.

12/03/2007

Automation Comes Alive

The full motion and unfolding sequence of events in videos make the examples clearer and easier to understand.

11/06/2007

Wireless Applications Coming to Light

Wireless case studies are scarce, so it’s ironic that Emerson, Honeywell, Invensys and others are coming up with them.

09/27/2007

Follow in Batch’s Footsteps

Can batch standards, methods and concepts break through their technological limits to the world of ideas?

08/31/2007

Survey Snapshots Wireless Users

CONTROL recently conducted its first SP100 Wireless Survey of almost 500 readers about where and how they use wireless in their plant-floor applications.

08/01/2007

Action Figures of Summer

Jim Montague talks about the few process control-related heroes found in the mainstream media and in less-hyped branches of literature and the fine arts.

08/01/2007

Maybe You Didn’t Hear Me

Why do engineers and their companies tolerate safety standards that aren’t enforced until after accidents occur, and why do they accept safety device certifications that only cover compliance in lab-based settings?

07/13/2007

Get up, out and about

Though some engineers say their industries and job prospects have recovered recently, many say that their administrators’ main mission is to wring as much short-term cash as possible from their operations.

06/04/2007

Can we Talk?

There is some major-league wriggling going on as participants try to avoid simply discussing whether many U.S. oil and gas producers and their supporting industries are doing their best on process safety.

05/10/2007

Can Foundation fieldbus (FF) stay hungry?

FF may be facing unexpected challenges in its task to remain useful as it integrates ever more closely with EDDL, COTS Ethernet, and Internet-bsed and/or wireless networking. Executive Editor Jim Montague reports.

04/10/2007

On the same page

Many plant-floor engineers and IT technicians report they’re coming to a new appreciation of the efficiencies and savings that can be generated by simply integrating their industrial and corporate networks.

03/09/2007

Luddites unite!

Tradition for its own sake is useless, of course, but tradition based on common sense is crucial for the success and safety of process control engineers and their applications.

03/01/2007

Real-world education

Many newly minted control and automation engineers find they need months of training to learn how their employers apply their technologies because of lack of coordination between schools and employers.

02/01/2007

Seeds with teeth!

Senior Tech Editor Jim Montague muses that maybe it's time to think up some new incentive programs for individuals and teams to make more and better innovations in process control applications.

01/05/2007