Voices: Other Voices

Choose and Manage Your Automation Suppliers Carefully

How Can We Manage Our Supplier Performance to Achieve Optimum Long-Term Results

By Roy Kok

The technologies we choose have a major impact on our careers and the competitiveness of our companies. With the total cost of ownership being over four times the initial acquisition and installation cost, the choices are much more important than they may at first appear. Making the right choice can end your career or launch it. However, for the company, the choice that is made, even a bad one, will be in place until the end of its useful life.

With leaner engineering departments and changing technologies to choose from, selecting the right solution is an ever-growing challenge. So the question becomes, "What's the best process for making a strategic selection." The follow-up is "How can we manage our supplier performance to achieve optimum long-term results."

First you need to understand that selecting the right technology will require both research and a team effort. You need to clearly define the scope of the project. Have you had a past solution, and why are you considering a change? What are the key benefits you're seeking? Do you want to improve quality? Agility? Performance? Reduce costs? What are the attributes that will make your company more competitive? After all, isn't that the ultimate question?
Selecting the right supplier will require the development of an extensive criteria list. A highly technical solution will typically have over 150 criteria to evaluate. These will fall into one of three categories:

  1. Capabilities – In this category, you are evaluating the current capabilities of the company and its products or services. Are they features you need, and can this company provide them? Does the company have technical support in your region? Is there a local training department? Are parts stored locally.
  2. Presence – In this category, you are evaluating the current stability, growth and penetration of the supplier and its products or services in your context (region and/or industry). Is the company a relevant supplier of this technology or service? Is it successful in my industry? In my region? Is it growing?
  3. Vision – In this category, you are evaluating the alignment of the company with your corporate goals and future vision. Is the candidate company developing technology that you will be using in the future? Is it investing in this technology? Is it supporting future standards? Is it staffing as you want it to to provide the kind of support you will need?

Your evaluation criteria should be straightforward, easily understandable and, ideally, drive a quantitative response. Make sure your question facilitates a scalable result. For example, a question about support personnel could be, "Do you have support personnel in my region?" However, a better question would be "List the support personnel you have in my region and give their history." Creating criteria that prompt yes/no responses do little to help compare one solution to another.

Think as broadly as possible about your selection criteria. Don't forget to include categories for integration with other business systems, long-term ownership and career planning (How will ownership transition to new stakeholders as careers advance? How will new users be brought up to speed?). Don't forget to consider items you will encounter over the life of a system; e.g., upcoming technologies, standards or enhancements to your business practices.

Once you've made your selection and implemented the system, you'll need to move on to supplier performance relationship management (SPRM), and focus on maximizing the benefits of this selection over the lifecycle of the solution.

It is a fact that for strategic and complex technology solutions, the total cost of ownership over the lifecycle of the product is over four times the initial cost of acquisition and implementation. You have service costs, technology upgrades, spare or replacement parts, training, consulting and continued engineering. These are all important categories to consider in making the initial selection, but they are also important areas to manage on an ongoing basis to maximize the benefits of the system and the value derived through your relationship with the supplier.

Here too, a formal process to manage the relationship is critical. When you mention supplier relationship management (SRM), those in the purchasing realm will see it as managing your supply chain. There are many SRM products on the market for that purpose.

In the world of automation, where a strategic selections revolves around a technology such as a distributed control, manufacturing execution or enterprise asset management system, the need is not in managing ongoing deliverables and product quality, but in continually evaluating, managing and improving your service relationship (Figure 1).

Just as with supplier selection, quantifiable criteria are important. You can't improve what you can't measure. and you can't measure something you can't put a number to.

This is an area that ARC Advisory Group sees as underperforming across the industry. This area is better known as supplier performance and relationship management (SPRM). Even the companies that have formal SPRM processes can quickly identify areas that require improvement. These usually involve training and consistency across the organization.

The key to effective supplier performance and relationship management involves three areas:

  1. KPIs – The right items to measure, year over year, to gauge that your relationship and the services provided are healthy and on track.
  2. Process – A regimented and controlled process delivering repeatability, year over year, even with changing personnel or corporate stakeholders.
  3. Scorecard – A simple tool that summarizes the relationship performance and helps to guide constructive discussions that will lead to mutually beneficial results.

Read Also: Of Swiss Cheese, KPIs and Process Safety

The KPIs, when properly defined, enable you to manage one vendor with a single or multi-site deployment and compare multiple vendor performances against each other. The key is to create a framework and process that will enable continuous measurement and continuous improvement. The result will be improved performance, managed costs and maximized adherence to your business objectives (quality, throughput, uptime, etc.).

Many companies implement such programs for supplier selection or supplier management, but in ARC's experience, rarely are they implemented with a degree of consistency or thoroughness that should be expected for such strategic components in the operation of a company. This is an area where improvement can lead to a significant return on investment. 

More from this voice

Title

Demanding Software Security Assurance

Users Wonder, "How Dependable, Trustworthy and Resilient Is My Supplier's Software?"

02/10/2011

What the Tweet?!

Follow Us on Twitter. But Why Should You? Why Would You Follow Anybody? In Real Life, That Behavior Can Get You Arrested

02/10/2011

How Can the NERC CIP Standards Be Improved?

The Requirements in the CIP Standards Are Pretty Good, but They Do Not Address Common Methods of Attacking a Protected Network

12/06/2010

The Can of Worms Is Open-Now What?

Designing a Good Cyber Defense for Your SCADA or Process Control System Is No Longer an Option

09/27/2010

Getting OPC Security Under Control

What Do You Use OPC For? How Does Your Company Use OPC in Its Operations?

08/08/2010

Could Cyber Terrorists Attack Our Company?

Less Than 25% of the Incidents Recorded in the RISI Database Represent Intentional Attacks on Control Systems

06/02/2010

Safety and Security: Two Sides of the Same Coin

A Weakness in Security Creates Increased Risk, Which in Turn Creates a Decrease in Safety, so Safety and Security Are Directly Proportional, but Are Both Inversely Proportional to Risk

03/25/2010

Instrumentation as a Foundation for Profit

What Is the Real Value of Instrumenting Production Processes? Control Engineers Know It. Do You?

02/02/2010

Top 10 Procurement Mistakes

Read about the 10 Supplier Pricing Procurement Mistakes Organizations Face

12/14/2009

Do You Really Need to Train Them On...Everything?

Many Times Training Classes Are Ineffective because They Lack a True Training Objective

11/02/2009

Voices From the Project

Shouldn't Process Automation Technology Be Easier to Engineer, Implement, Operate and Maintain?

10/12/2009

Vintner Saves with Distributed Architecture

Automation In Wine Making. Winemakers Are Given the Necessary Tools to Properly Manage the End Product Flow. From Grape Growing to Bottling

08/12/2009

Use Suppliers' Pricing Mistakes

Learn the 10 Supplier Errors That Can Put Dollars In Your Pocket

06/24/2009

Process Automation: Harder, More Profitable

Success in Factory Automation Is No Free Ticket for Success in Process Automation

03/02/2009

The Wireless Hype in Process Automation

With Fuzzy Logic All of the Control Problems of the World Were to Be Easily Solved, Along with World Hunger, AIDS and Environmental Pollution.

12/08/2008

What’s Interoperability and Why Is It Important?

The IICI Develops Industry Consortium Establishing an ISA Interoperability Designation to Identify and Promote Interoperability Standards and Compliant Products and Systems

10/06/2008

Getting Up to Smart Speed

Use Variable Speed Drives to Save Money, but Gain Even More by Thinking Strategically and Picking Projects Carefully

09/15/2008

Getting into Discrete

Process Meets Packaging

09/09/2008

Domino Theory

Can ISA88 and ISA95 Knock Down the Barriers Between Batch and Continuous Processing?

09/09/2008

Skills Gap is Reality for Adaptive Manufacturing

These Over-50 Operators and Engineers Are the Human Computers of Operations and the Only Thing Standing Between Profit and Loss

08/05/2008