White Papers

on 'Wireless'

21-40 of 39 < first | | next | last >
  • A Comparison of WirelessHART and ISA100.11a

    The technology advancements in measurement instruments and final control elements provide greater process insight, reduce engineering costs and contribute to improving the overall operational performance of the plant. These instruments are often collectively referred to as smart devices.

    Emerson Process Management
    09/04/2012
  • How to Choose the Right Bus for Your Measurement System

    When you have hundreds of different data acquisition (DAQ) devices to choose from on a wide variety of buses, it can be difficult to select the right bus for your application needs. Each bus has different advantages and is optimized for throughput, latency, portability or distance from a host. This white paper examines the most common PC bus options and outlines the technical considerations to keep in mind when choosing the right bus for your measurement application.

    National Instruments
    07/09/2012
  • Improving Calibration with HART Diagnostics

    The widespread use of digital instrumentation with a digital communications protocol calls for new thinking about the traditional tools used by technicians for instrument maintenance and calibration. HART protocol instrumentation is by far the most used of this type of system. The HART Maintenance Device would be just such a tool, providing basic communications and diagnostic capabilities to support the maintenance and troubleshooting of HART instruments.

    Martel Electronics
    05/14/2012
  • A Guide to Managing Industrial Wireless Networks

    The last 10 years have seen a major expansion of the use of wireless data technology in every aspect of life and in every industrial venue. From the ubiquitous cell phone to smart phones, tablets and more, wireless data communications have become an important, perhaps the most important, medium. In the last half dozen years, wireless field devices have begun penetrating the industrial environment too. IT and plant floor communications managers are faced with a daunting task in coordinating all the uses of wireless in the average 21st-century plant.

    As more and more wireless devices and applications become an integral part of the industrial arena landscape, concern grows over in which layer of the network these wireless devices should be placed. This question concerns everyone since this is sure to impact plant or plant operation in the near future.

    We typically see two physical networks. The Process Control Network (PCN) involves Layers 2 and below. The Business Network (BN) involves Layer 4 of the Purdue model. If you are part of a plant team that supports either of these networks, the discussions within this paper have been or will be part of an ongoing discussion for your organization.

    We've seen a number of major companies make an attempt to stake out where wireless devices will fall and under what level of the network. This paper addresses these types of issues and is intended to provide answers to the many questions that are sure to arise.

    Apprion
    04/23/2012
  • The 10 Commandments of Wireless Communications

    In this white paper, Mike Fahrion discusses 10 basic rules that will help you ensure success in the design and implementation of your wireless network.

    B&B Electronics, Mike Fahrion
    04/09/2012
  • Special Report: Cyber Security

    The technology advances in control systems and open systems have afforded us improved efficiency, productivity and the ability to advance our operations. However, these improved technology advances have also come with risks that threaten these efficiencies. Viruses; an increased dependency on uptime, availability and reliability; operator errors and increased regulations are just some of the threats today's manufacturers need to contend with when managing their operations. In this Putman Media Special Report, we take a look at the cybersecurity issues today's manufacturers need to contend with; identify control systems vulnerabilities and offer a three-step approach for building better cyber security at your operations.

    Honeywell Process Solutions
    02/20/2012
  • Ethernet Enables Midstream Oil and Gas Communications

    Ethernet is everywhere. If you standardize on Ethernet for all your communications, you can improve safety and reduce costs in ESD/SIS applications and pipeline and in-plant SCADA. Ethernet can also, and probably already does, connect the plant to MES and ERP systems, as well as VoIP and all other network needs, such as email and file transfer. Using a single communications protocol reduces complexity and improves the robustness of your industrial communications. This white paper is focused on midstream oil and gas operations, but can be useful to any plant engineer or operator.

    Hirschmann
    09/29/2011
  • Explosion Protection and Intrinsic Safety 101

    The Engineer's Guide is an invaluable reference tool with comprehensive information on technologies, products and technical data. It contains everything you need to know about intrinsic safety technology, hazardous locations, surge protection, HART interface solutions, and signal conditioning.

    Pepperl+Fuchs
    09/29/2011
  • Implementing Mission Critical Data Connectivity with OPC

    In order to ensure the constant operation of their mission critical OPC applications, industry leaders turn to OPC vendors and products that provide redundancy. Oil and gas, power generation, waste water and utilities provide mission critical services to people every day. OPC redundancy ensures their crucial control data is always flowing.

    MatrikonOPC
    04/26/2011
  • Understanding Cable Assembly Molding

    While a molded cable assembly can offer significant advantages over a similar product of a mechanical construction, the art of insert molding remains somewhat of a mystery to cable assembly consumers. While attracted by the potential for a more aesthetically pleasing product that can be sealed from the environment and rendered 'tamper proof', the complexity of the insert molding manufacturing process is often over looked.

    Many cable assembly engineers who are consumers - but not producers - of molded assemblies are familiar to some degree with conventional molding. In this environment, the goal is the maximization of process speed which translates directly to bottom line financial performance. Manufacturing lot sizes are often characterized by long runs, where the same part is produced continuously over a considerable amount of time. The molding machines are usually horizontal in construction, use a closed cavity approach with auto-ejection of the finished parts, and operate at much higher injection pressures and speeds than an insert molding process. Additionally, the often uniform nature of the parts relative to wall thickness, balanced runner systems, and sufficient draft on the molded parts being produced serve to support consistent quality in the face of maximum manufacturing speed. The ability to optimize tool cooling, standardize mounting, and implement automated processes are also major differentiators between the conventional horizontal molding and vertical insert molding approaches. The result, all things equal, is a much higher production rate for finished parts in a conventional molding process.

    What then are the challenges of the insert molding process used to manufacture cable assemblies, and, more importantly, how are they met by the manufacturer? At a high level there are four major areas of consideration when discussing the intricacies of insert molding. These include the operator, tooling, equipment, and the process itself. Let's examine each of these in more detail.

    Operator: As with any non-automated process, it is the operator who is often the most important component of the success or failure of a manufacturing lot. This is especially true in cable assembly molding. In addition to knowing the basics of machine operation, the operator has several variables to properly monitor and control if he or she are to produce parts that meet the established design and quality guidelines. In light of some of the equipment and component variability discussed earlier, some of these operator focused considerations include...

    Mike Levesque, Shawn Young & Brock Richard, C&M Corporation
    04/05/2011
  • 1 Gigabit Industrial Ethernet Field Network Delivers Determinism and Accommodates 10/100/1000 Mb TCP/IP Field Devices

    The continuing drive to improve productivity will encourage more automation networking. The driving factors behind this expected growth include lean working, increased traceability legislation, product lifecycle management production (PLM), and improvements in manufacturing cycle times. This requires connecting the factory floor to the corporate offices where enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems make information available backwards into the supply chain, as well as forward to customers. Simply put, everyone wants to see what's happening. As a result, networks and the information they handle are becoming as important as the industrial control functions they manage.

    This white paper describes the open CC-Link IE Field network, an Industrial Ethernet technology, which operates at 1 Gigabit/sec. This data rate is 10 times faster than other Industrial Ethernet technologies in order to provide highly responsive control system communications, while at the same time allowing connection to field devices (RFID readers, vision systems, etc.) that have TCP/IP Ethernet ports communicating at slower 10Mb or 100Mb data rates.

    CC-Link
    03/30/2011
  • Remote Monitoring Helped Cellu Tissue Reduce Maintenance Costs

    In today's competitive pulp and paper industry, mills must find ways to reduce costs if they are to improve their business performance. As operating expenses are on the rise, service and support programs are becoming more scrutinized. Maintenance effectiveness is a key objective to reduce these costs--without the eventual impact on production that occurs by simply slashing budgets. In this white paper, learn how remote monitoring helps to lower maintenance costs.

    Honeywell
    03/15/2011
  • MESA Global Education Program

    This initiative is the first step in filling a noticeable void in industry - the lack of independent competency training in the Operations Management (MES/MOM) arena. This lack of wide-scale competency is recognized as a major barrier to plant and supply chain optimization and global operations excellence.

    With members in 85 countries globally, MESA is an independent, objective community of like-minded people and enterprises working to make Operations more reliable, capable and profitable. Some of the foremost experts across the Operations Management landscape are leading the knowledge sharing within the MESA community by offering programs across 4 continents by mid-2011.

    MESA Certificate of Competency (CoC) for MES/MOM* Methodologies: A 4-day, comprehensive program of MES/MOM Methodologies courses aimed at Systems Analysts, Architects, Programmers, Project Managers and Consultants.

    MESA Certificate of Awareness (CoA) for MES/MOM Business Awareness: A 2-day, high-level program of MES/MOM Business Functions courses geared for executives, manufacturing/operations and IT personnel and sales professionals. The CoA courses are higher level, short versions of the CoC program.

    Learn more.

    MESA
    01/19/2011
  • Explaining the Agency Approval Process for Wire and Cable Products

    Some engineers think it is science. Others contend it is some type of black magic.

    Many have no idea of exactly how the process works.

    Regardless of what is known –or unknown – about the submission and evaluation process, there are few that will disagree with the premise that agency certifications, such as those offered by organizations like Underwriters Laboratories (UL), Canadian Standards Association (CSA), or Intertek, formerly known as Edison Testing Laboratories (ETL), to name only a few, are an important part of any product offering in the wire and cable industry. With today’s focus on product safety, there has been an increased need for wire and cable products to carry either a listed or recognized mark signifying they have been independently evaluated and have met the appropriate safety guidelines that have been established based on their intended use.

    In an attempt to help bring some clarity to the agency certification process for bulk cable, I have posed a series of related questions to Randy Elliott, C&M Corporation’s Regulatory Compliance Engineer. Randy has been a practicing engineer in the wire and cable industry for over 20 years. His background in R&D and design engineering has brought him into contact with regulatory agencies and their requirements on a regular basis throughout his career. For the past three years, his focus has been completely on regulatory issues for C&M.

    Who is responsible for testing and what do their results mean?

    Mike Levesque & Randy Elliott, C&M Corporation
    12/13/2010
  • ISA100 and Wireless Standards Convergence

    ISA100 is one of three standards competing in industrial wireless sensing. What is distinctive about ISA100? What are the prospects for convergence of standards? What would convergence be worth to the industrial wireless market?

    ISA100 is a major standards initiative managed by the International Society of Automation (ISA). In addition to standards development, a new organization, the ISA100 Wireless Compliance Institute (WCI), is charged with delivering compliance certification services for the work of ISA100.

    The ISA100 committee establishes standards, recommended practices, technical reports, and related information for implementing wireless systems in the automation and control environment, with an initial focus on the field level. Given the committee's broad scope, they have formed a number of working groups to pursue specific tasks. The primary deliverable from the Committee thus far is the standard ISA-100.11a, "Wireless Systems for Industrial Automation: Process Control and Related Applications". However a quick glance at the list of working groups shows that several other topics will be addressed by future ISA100 deliverables.

    In 2006, at about the same time ISA100 was forming, the ISA also created the non-profit Automation Standards Compliance Institute (ASCI). This organization manages certification, conformance, and compliance assessment activities in the ISA's automation domain.

    ASCI extends the standards work of ISA by facilitating the effective implementation and independent testing of ISA standards. It creates a vital link between the development of standards and industries' implementation of the standards. The ISA100 Wireless Compliance Institute (WCI) functions as an operational group within ASCI. Operating the ISA100 Wireless Compliance Institute within ASCI allows it to leverage the infrastructure of ASCI, which in addition to WCI, is shared by several ASCI compliance programs.

    ARC Advisory Group
    11/22/2010
  • Considerations When Choosing a Wireless Network

    The decision to implement wireless technology in your industrial facility is a strategic choice, enabling an infrastructure that will provide significant benefits for your company beyond avoiding the wiring costs. The right decision will help improve safety, optimize the plant and ensure compliance. Wireless is a complex enabling technology that requires deliberate consideration before broad deployment in an industrial facility.

    Honeywell
    09/09/2010
  • Reliance Group Improves Data Accuracy with Honeywell's OneWireless Solution

    The Reliance Group, India's largest private sector enterprise, recognized the business potential of moving to a wireless monitoring system and implemented Honeywell's OneWireless solutions at the Gujarat refinery to gain control of data, streamline tasks and improve overall efficiency.

    Honeywell
    08/04/2010
  • Improving SCADA Operations Using Wireless Instrumentation

    The purpose of this paper is to explore the particular ways in which operators can tightly integrate wireless instrumentation networks with SCADA and realize.

    Integrating wireless instrumentation with SCADA systems can drive operational efficiency and reduce deployment costs.

    The use of wireless instruments in pipelines and gas production operations has been gaining momentum over the past few years. Driven by cost cutting measures and the need to gain more operational visibility to meet regulatory requirements, wireless instruments eliminate expensive trenching and cabling while providing access to hard-to-reach areas using self-contained, battery-powered instruments. However, SCADA engineers and operators are facing the challenge of integrating wireless instrumentation networks with other communication infrastructure available in the field. Managing and debugging dispersed wireless networks presents a new level of complexity to field operators that could deter them from adopting wireless instrumentation despite the exceptional savings.

    This paper will look into the particular ways in which operators can tightly integrate wireless instrumentation networks with SCADA and realize the full benefits of such an integrated solution.

    Control Microsystems
    06/29/2010
21-40 of 39 < first | | next | last >