Live from WBF 2008-- Bianca Sholten asks a second question...

Should Operators Speak ISA-95? Bianca Scholten Ordina Technical Automation Presenter • Bianca Scholten • Fellow • Ordina Technical Automation • IT company, > 5000 employees • Author of “The Road to Integration; A Guide to Applying the ISA-95 Standard in Manufacturing” • Co-author of “The hitchhiker’s guide to Manufacturing • Voting member of SP95 Agenda • Typical technician’s interface • Babylonian confusion of tongues • The perfect world: speak the same language • Advantages • Feasibility of ISA-95 as a standard language • The road to integration • So, should operators speak ISA-95? Advantages • ISA-88 has proven advantages • Faster and easier integration • Improved communication with external parties • Less errors, shorter projects • Improved basis for benchmarking • Improved internal communication (people + systems) • Faster integration of newly bought production facilities • Easier management of data in separate systems Feasibility • Applicability of ISA-95 during… • Preparation • Functional specifications • Data management • Vertical integration The road to integration • Management choice • Basic training course • Company specific workshop • Process modelling • Training of people involved • Templates for documents, specs • Speak ’95 with external parties • Use ’95 object models for custom software • ’95 compliance as a selection criterium • Train system’s end users So, should operators speak ISA-95? •  Yes! •  But don’t go scheduling training courses for next week! •  Top down approach •  Systems first, users will follow naturally •  Long term advantages, strong management needed Questions?  

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments. Please comply with our Community rules.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments