Exchange the Exchanger?

Problem Solving Ideas: A Reader's Welded Plate Heat Exchanger has Failed Three Times in Six Years--Should They go to a Shell and Tube?

We have a batch ethoxylation / propoxylation process. Temperatures range from 85° F during changeover to 350° F during reaction periods. Pressure ranges from full vacuum to 100 psig. Currently we use a welded plate and frame heat exchanger with a diathermic fluid medium for cooling applications. This heat exchanger has failed three times in six years. We have two schools of thought here: One believes that the temperature swings inherent to our process are the cause of the equipment failure, while the other feels that it is something else. Should we go to a shell and tube solution? If not a shell and tube, then what? Some of our concerns are maintaining current cooling capabilities, changeover, and sheer available space for installation.


--from May 2004 CONTROL





I would never use a plate and frame heat exchanger for an application with temperature swings. Are they approach temperature limited? Probably. It is hard to get very tight approach temper-atures with a shell-and-tube since true counter current is almost impossible. If they don't have room for shell-and-tube they would never have room for double pipe.


Maybe they need a shell and tube exchanger with a refrigerant loop so they can minimize surface area and still fit a U-tube in place.


How about this? Stand a U-tube straight up! In my experience we had a few like this.


They can't be in a fouling service. But I don't think this is true as they currently have a welded plate and frame.


Tim Holtan

Smart Signal

Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments