Upgrading a Wastewater SCADA System

The City of Yuma installed a SCADA system to control and monitor its water and wastewater distribution system remotely. But as the city expanded, the existing SCADA system lacked the needed support, performance and diagnostic capabilities.

Share Print Related RSS
Page 1 of 2 « Prev 1 | 2 View on one page

By Bob Moreno, Electronics Technician for the City of Yuma

Motor Control

The city of Yuma is tucked in the Arizona desert near the state’s borders with Mexico and California. It is the nation’s third-fastest-growing area, and over the past decade, Yuma’s population has grown more than 50%, with no signs of slowing down.

Yuma’s population doubles in winter as retirees and visitors flock to the warm climate. Explosive growth has placed tremendous demands on the city’s ability to reliably and efficiently collect up to eight million gallons of sewage per day through its wastewater collection system.

In 1985, Yuma installed a proprietary SCADA system to control and monitor its water and wastewater distribution system remotely. But as the city expanded, it became clear that the existing SCADA system lacked the needed support, performance and diagnostic capabilities.

 

A typical remote water pump station site with an MCC, a control panel and a generator all installed outdoors.

Because the SCADA system lacked the functionality to monitor individual lift station pumps in outlying areas remotely, operators were not alerted to pump malfunctions. They would instead often learn about pump problems from residents’ phone calls or when they were found during scheduled pump station visits.

Upgrades were difficult and costly because the system was proprietary. Those of us working on the systems were often forced to contract outside support services for routine maintenance and repairs at a cost of up to $5,000 or more per visit. As the system aged, these visits were becoming more frequent, usually once a month for each of more than 20 sites. Quick access to replacement parts was also an issue, with spares often taking more than a month to arrive.

The outdated SCADA system also made it difficult for the City of Yuma to meet increasingly stringent environmental regulations, and violations could have resulted in hefty fines.

Changes Needed

Our consulting engineers, our internal project management and our operational staff all knew that we needed a new SCADA system that was easy to use, scalable, reliable and more cost-effective than the existing one. We wanted a system that plant operators could configure and monitor over a network. Finally, the system had to be supportable with our own internal resources so we wouldn’t have to rely on outside contractors.

The new system needed to accommodate additional pumping stations to meet Yuma’s expected residential and industrial growth. Reliable monitoring capabilities were critical to maintain regulatory compliance, and we needed to keep operational and support costs low to stay within a tight municipal budget.

A key feature needed for the new system was the ability to help operators avoid delays in wastewater service. We also needed a responsive and dependable control system vendor that could supply spare parts quickly and troubleshoot system problems efficiently.

We worked with Yuma-based OneSource Distributors and teamed with Rockwell Automation to develop a control system to meet our needs. Critical to success was developing a SCADA system that remotely monitored all outlying stations from the central control room at the main treatment plant.

“Some of our pumping and lift stations are more than 11 miles from the main plant,” says Arlen Ritter, a senior operator with the City of Yuma. “We needed a networked system so we’d know exactly where to send maintenance personnel to investigate or repair a problem. We also wanted remote alerts to eliminate the need for wastewater personnel monitoring pump stations 24 hours a day.”

We now have 26 remote sites, each equipped with an Allen-Bradley Intellicenter MCC (www.rockwellautomation.com). MCC motor control includes E3 Plus solid-state relays networked to a local PLC via DeviceNet. Of the 26 remote sites, five are main wastewater pumping stations, and each of these has an SLC 500 PLC acting as the remote terminal unit (RTU). The 21 remote water pump stations each have a SLC 5/03 RTU.

 

The City of Yuma’s main wastewater pumping station motors are controlled and monitored by multi-section MCCs. The motor control circuit solid state relays are linked to a local RTU PLC via DeviceNet.

In both cases, the RTU PLC talks to the solid-state motor control relays via DeviceNet. This high-speed digital link allows us to monitor pump motor amperage, elapsed pump motor runtimes and several pump motor fault conditions.

At the main control room, we installed an RSView Human Machine Interface (HMI) to remotely control and monitor the remote sites. We have RSView running on a two screens, one 21" and the other 42".

Communications between the main control room and each of the 26 remote sites is via a licensed radio frequency. Each RTU is linked to its remote radio via an RS-232 link, and the RSView HMI stations are also linked to the home base radio via RS-232.

Money Saved, Improvements Made

We installed the new SCADA system for about $245,000, half the installed cost of the old system. The new SCADA system monitors and reports individual pump status and other critical operational parameters to one central location. This saves us up to $100,000 a year in labor because we don’t have to routinely send plant personnel to each remote site.

Page 1 of 2 « Prev 1 | 2 View on one page
Share Print Reprints Permissions

What are your comments?

You cannot post comments until you have logged in. Login Here.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments