From the "tell them our wireless is better" department...

Nov. 15, 2006
I've had numerous conversations with Honeywell technologists and marketers the last couple of days. A very long conversation over the course of two days with Dan Sheflin, Honeywell's VP Technology, can serve as an illustration. Basically, Dan and I discussed how to move SP100 along faster. He agreed that, as Jose Gutierrez and I proposed a month ago, we ought to start doing testing on the products as soon as possible, while continuing full stroke on the rest of the standards process. The fact ...
I've had numerous conversations with Honeywell technologists and marketers the last couple of days. A very long conversation over the course of two days with Dan Sheflin, Honeywell's VP Technology, can serve as an illustration. Basically, Dan and I discussed how to move SP100 along faster. He agreed that, as Jose Gutierrez and I proposed a month ago, we ought to start doing testing on the products as soon as possible, while continuing full stroke on the rest of the standards process. The fact is, Honeywell, and its consortium partners, agree far more with Emerson, and their consortium partners, than they disagree. Being engineers, many times the SP100 and HART Wireless committees get bogged down in the technical minutiae of the radios and don't focus on the larger picture. Because of their concentration in field instrumentation and control systems, Emerson has chosen to deliberately focus on the main process loop control and asset management portions of the wireless application spectrum. Not a bad idea, and a very good model for Emerson, which is dominant in field devices worldwide. Honeywell has taken a wider view, in part because they don't have the field instrument bias Emerson has, although perhaps "bias" has more negative connotations than I intend...and they see a wider field of play for wireless in the industral environment, including wireless worker, and personnel locators, and even coupling gas detection with personnel location. Ken Moshier, a Honeywell System Architect, showed me the integration of personnel location, "man down" and mustering stations with their new acquisition of Zellweger gas detectors, using RFID. This, to Honeywell, is an essential part of a plant's wireless requirements, and put that way, I cannot say they are wrong. The task before SP100 is to find common ground between these two equally valid strategic views of wireless in the industrial plant setting. Compared to that challenge, simply selecting a radio, or multiple yet user-transparent protocols, is fundamentally trivial. (Okay, radioheads, pile on! You know that if you look at the wider picture I'm right.)

Sponsored Recommendations

Make Effortless HMI and PLC Modifications from Anywhere

The tiny EZminiWiFi is a godsend for the plant maintenance engineers who need to make a minor modification to the HMI program or, for that matter, the PLC program. It's very easy...

The Benefits of Using American-Made Automation Products

Discover the benefits of American-made automation products, including stable pricing, faster delivery, and innovative features tailored to real-world applications. With superior...

50 Years of Automation Innovation and What to Expect Next

Over the past 50 years, the automation technology landscape has changed dramatically, but many of the underlying industry needs remain unchanged. To learn more about what’s changed...

Manufacturing Marvels Highlights Why EZAutomation Is a Force to Be Reckoned With

Watch EZAutomation's recent feature on the popular FOX Network series "Manufacturing Marvels" and discover what makes them a force to be reckoned with in industrial automation...