By Dan Hebert, Senior Technical Editor
When you’re planning a project for your process plant, one of your most important decisions is whether to execute the work on a fixed-price or a time-and-material basis. Last month’s column discussed best practices for time-and-material projects; this month’s column will look at fixed-price work.
On fixed-price projects, total cost is known up-front because the bidder makes schedule and performance commitments. But getting firm fixed-price bids is not easy, especially for smaller multi-discipline projects.
For big capital projects over $1 million, most process firms require extensive internal documentation and justification to garner corporate approval. This up-front paperwork can often be turned into a bid document, and it’s relatively easy to find multiple fixed-price bidders for these large jobs.
But for the more common and numerous smaller projects, especially those that involve work in many different discipline areas, it can be difficult to create a bid package and find qualified contractors.
Many of these smaller projects come out of maintenance budgets, and the internal approval process is simpler. Most of these projects are also executed at the plant level instead of at corporate― - so staff to prepare bid documents, find outside contractors and solicit bids is limited.
The solution is to find a right-sized engineering firm that specializes in fixed-price, multi-discipline work. An example is CMM Engineering (www.cmmepc.com) in Dana Point, Calif. “All of our work is fixed-price, and we only work in industrial facilities,” says Marc Mitre, president of CMM. “Our clients come to us for three reasons. One, we can submit fixed-price bids without requiring them to prepare a detailed bid package. We do this by spending time at their plant and becoming familiar with the scope of the project. We then write a project scope for their approval and include it as part of our bid package,” explains Mitre. “The second reason our clients work with us is that we’re able to do the entire scope of the project including site prep, architectural, civil/structural, process, and mechanical, electrical and control systems. For each of these areas, we can do both design and construction, and that’s the third reason clients work with us,” adds Mitre.
This all sounds good, but the problem is finding a firm like CMM that’s willing to cost-effectively execute relatively small multi-discipline projects on a fixed-price basis without the need for a detailed bid package.
The first step in the selection process is eliminating the pretenders. Design firms will often show interest, but will ultimately disappoint if they cannot perform construction. Ask for their contractor’s license number and check same on the issuing party’s web site. If the firm doesn’t have the right licenses, they will look to partner with a construction company, and this will needlessly complicate the project. Speaking of construction companies, this is another area where pretenders abound.
