Industrial Defender and US Pat. No. 7,246,156

Dec. 14, 2007
As the industry is still reeling from the onslaught of patent trolls over the past few years, when Industrial Defender (who most of us are still having trouble not calling "Verano" or even HP RTAP) revealed that they had been awarded a significant cybersecurity patent, the immediate reaction of most in the industry was, "Oh, no, not another one." So I arranged to talk with Todd Nicholson, Chief Marketing Officer and Andrew Ginter, Chief Technology Officer of Industrial Defender. I made it clear...
As the industry is still reeling from the onslaught of patent trolls over the past few years, when Industrial Defender (who most of us are still having trouble not calling "Verano" or even HP RTAP) revealed that they had been awarded a significant cybersecurity patent, the immediate reaction of most in the industry was, "Oh, no, not another one." So I arranged to talk with Todd Nicholson, Chief Marketing Officer and Andrew Ginter, Chief Technology Officer of Industrial Defender. I made it clear that the patent was the chief topic I was interested in, and Nicholson and Ginter were extremely forthcoming. While I still harbor reservations about whether their patent is ultimately defensible, the Patent Examiner doesn't agree with me, and his judgement, pending unlikely court action, is worth more than that of your humble editor and blogger. Andrew made it very clear that this was not a patent that attempted to control the cybersecurity market in the process industries. "The central claim," he said, "is claim number 1. That's what's novel here. It is our ability to open a one way socket without introducing any new security vulnerability. All the other claims depend from that first one." "What this gives us," Ginter went on, "is an honest competitive advantage over other people who can't do this. That's what we wanted." According to Nicholson, business has been brisk. I asked him to compare his capabilities with those of the just announced partnership between Invensys and Integralis. "We have the ability to provide 24/7 security services, and we have the advantage of being a control system vendor too. And we can do it under one roof," Nicholson said. And about that, I asked if they felt that RTAP, the SCADA system they continue to market, is inherently more secure than other competitive systems because of their work in security as Industrial Defender. Ginter said, "Well it wouldn't be fair, or true, to say that RTAP was designed from the ground up to be more secure. When it was designed originally, nobody was thinking about security in SCADA design. But we've improved it over the years, and one of the things we've done is to engineer in what we consider an effective level of security."

Sponsored Recommendations

IEC 62443 4-1 Cyber Certification – Why ML 3 is So Important

The IEC 62443 Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems - Part 4-1: Secure Product Development Lifecycle Requirements help increase resilience for control systems...

Multi-Server SCADA Maintenance Made Easy

See how the intuitive VTScada Services Page ensures your multi-server SCADA application remains operational and resilient, even when performing regular server maintenance.

Your Industrial Historical Database Should be Designed for SCADA

VTScada's Chief Software Architect discusses how VTScada's purpose-built SCADA historian has created a paradigm shift in industry expectations for industrial redundancy and performance...

Linux and SCADA – What You May Not Have Considered

There’s a lot to keep in mind when considering the Linux® Operating System for critical SCADA systems. See how the Linux security model compares to Windows® and Mac OS®.