You heard it here first-- ISA and HART agree to collaborate

Oct. 24, 2007
As I told you all in this blog after ISA, the fix is in. There will not be, God willing and the creek don't rise, another fieldbus war around the wireless standards for industrial plants. Here's the official release from ISA and HART Communication Foundation:

ISA and HART Communication Foundation Agree on Path toward Integrating WirelessHART with ISA100


Research Triangle Park, NC (24 October 2007) - During a series of meetings held in conjunction with ISA EXPO 2007, 2-4 Octo...
As I told you all in this blog after ISA, the fix is in. There will not be, God willing and the creek don't rise, another fieldbus war around the wireless standards for industrial plants. Here's the official release from ISA and HART Communication Foundation:

ISA and HART Communication Foundation Agree on Path toward Integrating WirelessHART with ISA100


Research Triangle Park, NC (24 October 2007) - During a series of meetings held in conjunction with ISA EXPO 2007, 2-4 October in Houston, Texas, the ISA100 Wireless Systems for Automation standards committee outlined an approach to accommodate and eventually integrate the WirelessHART standard and the ISA100 standard.
The approach will attempt to accommodate the HART 7 wireless protocol in release 1 of the ISA100.11a standard through a dual-gateway architecture, followed by a potentially more integrated approach in release 2.
"The meeting was a success. The end users, suppliers, HART Communication Foundation representatives, and the ISA100 members on the evaluation committee agreed that this approach is the most viable alternative to address the needs of the end user community, both in the short and long term," said ISA100 Co-Chair Wayne Manges of Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
The committee's decision defined options for future evaluation, including dual-stack end devices for integration at the device level, tunneling (pack at the device level, unpack at a higher level), and future integration at the MAC, DLL, and NET/TRAN levels.
"The ISA100-WirelessHART Analysis Team is evaluating how the WirelessHART protocol within HART 7 can be incorporated into the ISA100.11a standard while remaining consistent with the objectives of the ISA100 family of standards," said ISA100 Co-Chair Pat Schweitzer of Exxon Mobil. "The most important part of that evaluation is the obligation to continue our commitment to the end user, and we're confident that our final decisions will accomplish that goal."
"Standardized wireless communication with intelligent field devices is important for the process industry and we are pleased to be working with ISA to advance the standardization of this new capability," says HART Communication Foundation Executive Director Ron Helson. "Everyone agrees that incorporating WirelessHART in the developing ISA100 standards is in the best interest of the industry, preserving both current and future investments."
For more information about ISA100, or any of the ISA standards, visit www.isa.org/standards. For more information about WirelessHART(tm) and the HART Communication technology, go to www.hartcomm.org.

Sponsored Recommendations

IEC 62443 4-1 Cyber Certification – Why ML 3 is So Important

The IEC 62443 Security for Industrial Automation and Control Systems - Part 4-1: Secure Product Development Lifecycle Requirements help increase resilience for control systems...

Multi-Server SCADA Maintenance Made Easy

See how the intuitive VTScada Services Page ensures your multi-server SCADA application remains operational and resilient, even when performing regular server maintenance.

Your Industrial Historical Database Should be Designed for SCADA

VTScada's Chief Software Architect discusses how VTScada's purpose-built SCADA historian has created a paradigm shift in industry expectations for industrial redundancy and performance...

Linux and SCADA – What You May Not Have Considered

There’s a lot to keep in mind when considering the Linux® Operating System for critical SCADA systems. See how the Linux security model compares to Windows® and Mac OS®.