Nanny nanny boo boo…or is it? Walt Boyes comments…

Today, we received a press release from a security company, announcing that they had found a vulnerability in a piece of third-party software. We often get these. I'm not naming names. What we DON'T get, however, is the context. Such and such a vulnerability was found in such and such a software application. And so? And we didn't get that context in this case either. Industrial cybersecurity is based on risk analysis...and the security company did its customers a disservice in not explaining w...
March 19, 2008
Today, we received a press release from a security company, announcing that they had found a vulnerability in a piece of third-party software. We often get these. I'm not naming names. What we DON'T get, however, is the context. Such and such a vulnerability was found in such and such a software application. And so? And we didn't get that context in this case either. Industrial cybersecurity is based on risk analysis...and the security company did its customers a disservice in not explaining what the vulnerability's issues really are. The release did not say a darn thing about the business decisions that have to be made as a result of the vulnerability being discovered. Say what? Let me say it another way. There are vulnerabilities and there are vulnerabilities. A particular vulnerability may be a fatal issue for a SCADA system, or it may be a minor annoyance. It is incumbent on security companies to do the research and outline the risk clearly so that the business decision makers-- who are almost certainly NOT cybergeeks-- can make correct decisions. Otherwise, it sounds like a bunch of script kiddies saying "Nanny Nanny Boo Boo, we know something you don't know!"

About the Author

waltboyes

waltboyes

Sign up for Control eNews
Get the latest news and updates