Reader Feedback: No Unified Fieldbus Standard, Ever?

Aug. 18, 2014
Unified Standard Solely Exist Because Automation Vendors Will Always Want That Part of Their Solutions Strategy to Be Uniquely Theirs

Regarding the June cover story, "The Fieldbus Chronicles," I won’t tout myself as an expert in fieldbus deployment, other than to say we at PTC-Alliance prefer EtherNet/IP, as defined by Rockwell Automation, due to its overall versatility. That said, I don’t think you’ll ever see a unified standard if, for no other reason, than because automation vendors will always want that part of their solutions strategy to be uniquely theirs. Other reasons, of course, include legacy platform support, node count and scalability, to name a few. I like standards, and appreciate the conventional wisdom of a single fieldbus standard. Nonetheless, I’m not optimistic that I'll see such a fieldbus in my lifetime.

Nick Baranyk
PTC Alliance
[email protected]

Sponsored Recommendations

Municipalities are utilizing inline total solids measurements to enhance sludge thickening, lower polymer usage and cut operational expenses.
Carbon dioxide is increasingly recognized as a vital resource with significant economic potential. While the conversion of carbon dioxide into products is still in its infancy...
Discover our wide range of temperature transmitters that convert sensor signals from RTDs and thermocouples into stable and standardized output signals!
An innovative amine absorption-based carbon capture process enables retrofitting of existing industrial facilities to reduce emissions in hard-to-abate sectors, with advanced ...