Reader Feedback: No One Protocol for the Internet of Things

March 2, 2015
We are destined to have a multiplicity of protocols in our facilities.

Regarding, John Rezabek's February On the Bus column: I think we are destined to have a multiplicity of protocols in our facilities. Actuators and sensors will be at the level of the not-Internet of Things; Ethernet makes no sense there. But connecting AS-interface, IO-Link, FF, HART and ProfibusPA to the Industrial Internet of Things through intermediaries to Ethernet will allow integration with IIoT. I see Profinet as the backbone, with Profinet-specified proxies mapping data from the sensor level. Profinet connects devices to the controller, then OPC UA makes sense as the protocol upwards from the controller to the cloud/big data/analytics.

Carl Henning
Deputy Director, PI North America
[email protected]

[javascriptSnippet]

Sponsored Recommendations

The tiny EZminiWiFi is a godsend for the plant maintenance engineers who need to make a minor modification to the HMI program or, for that matter, the PLC program. It's very easy...
Discover the benefits of American-made automation products, including stable pricing, faster delivery, and innovative features tailored to real-world applications. With superior...
Over the past 50 years, the automation technology landscape has changed dramatically, but many of the underlying industry needs remain unchanged. To learn more about what’s changed...
Watch EZAutomation's recent feature on the popular FOX Network series "Manufacturing Marvels" and discover what makes them a force to be reckoned with in industrial automation...